Rubik's Cube
1-200, 201-400, 401-600, 601-800, 801-1000, 1001-1200, 1201-1400, 1401-1600, 1601-1800, 1801-2000, 2001-2200, 2201-2400
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
60123.06 secondsDaniel Belarminon/a20060401
60223.10 secondsAlex LockwoodLucky solve :D. I might not get this again for quite a while.20070530
60223.10 secondsAlex LeQuick OLL short PLL20080505
60423.13 secondsAlex Egandone for the sunday contest but never posted my results.
non lucky. look ahead on the f2l was amazing and the oll and pll were qucik
20080820
60523.15 secondsArjan BosseThis was done in my avg record at 20050821. Submitted it now to stay ahead of Sean in this category :D20050821
60623.16 secondsKyle RineMy personal best! It could have been faster, but i was using a cube that's not lubed, plus lockups. :)20080519
60723.23 secondsDennis Wongn/a20080322
60823.25 secondsWerner NelUsed my own F2L and no OLL or PLL algs (cause i dont know any.) got this one to video too.. =)20060730
60923.32 secondsFrédérick BadieSet during 2003 world championship.20030824
60923.32 secondsRobert SmithVery, very smooth solve using Roux's method. Unfortunately, it is no where close to where I average. I will get down there sometime!20070328
61123.33 secondsPeck Ern-WenI am 8 years old.20080816
61223.34 secondsNoah HeveyFastest non lucky. Still average around 30 seconds though. I really should get out of my 4 look into a 3 at least.
~xcool
[twistypuzzles.com]
20070516
61323.37 secondsCaleb KlingerI'm 15, and have only been cubing for 2 months, so I was pretty excited about this time. I don't know F2L but I use the Fridrich OLL and PLL algs. I broke 30 for the first time a few days before and really started practicing alot. I hope to break 20 soon. 20070207
61423.40 secondsJohn Cloningern/a20080801
61523.46 secondsKenneth GustavssonPractising for next competition. I usaly get about twice my record in competition average so I'm soon sub 45 =) =) =)20061110
61523.46 secondsAlex SterlingPretty easy F2L, I only use 13 algorithms. F2L is intuitive, LL cross is 2 algs, corner orient is a system of 3 algs, corner perm is 3 algs, edge perm is 5 algs. 20070303
61723.50 secondsThomas KohnI had that time two times that day.20050728
61823.51 secondsJacob Huangn/a 
61923.52 secondsTomasz Tomaszewskisub 25 done20050806
62023.54 secondsAtte TanskanenGetting faster. 
62123.58 secondsMichael DennyI just let it flow! If there's time on the clock, there's time to cube!!! 
62223.59 secondsJulien BochatonLucky..20060101
62323.60 secondsJulian TayThe solved20080408
62423.61 secondsKevin Wangn/a20070611
62523.66 secondsMohammad FuaathProof http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUBIV7qrvuM20080701
62623.67 secondsMattias BerglundFast first two layer, and then the FRUR'U'F orientation and the Z-permutation. 
62723.69 secondsBastiaan Malotauxn/a20080408
62823.89 secondsHwang-YongheeAt first korea sinkwang.corp solution, at last permute last layer solution. 
62823.89 secondsCristian GramaThis is my fastest time. I did it after lubing my DIY cube. Anyway my average is somewhere between 33-38.20080414
63023.92 secondsJulien RicaudNon lucky but very easy. Method: Layer by layer without F2L, OLL and PLL20050825
63123.93 secondsAndrew NelsonI was shooting for sub-30. Well, at the end of 12 solves, average was 30.03. I was livid. Then devin reminded me I could roll it. Ended up losing the first time (a 35.xx) for a 29.21. I'm happy for now.20070304
63223.97 secondsAndrew Shenn/a20071230
63323.98 secondsOlivier MaryThis record was done in front of Gilles Van Den Peereboom's eyes, with an Stackmat timer.20061122
63424 secondsGurmeet HunjanThis happened a good few years ago, but after trying for ages and averaging about 30 seconds I managed to get 24 seconds. My friends at school where amazed and there used to be a huge crowd watching. I ordered the moves from the rubik's web site and I'll be practising again. So watch out !!!!! ps If anyone can tell me where to get a rubik's cube, please e-mail me, I live in Glasgow, Scotland. 
63424 secondsOliver WolffSlowly improving . 
63424 secondsSatoru J. NodaNot including lucky cases. 
63424 secondsNathan VickeyDone a couple of times. Best lucky time is 21.5. 20070511
63424 secondsLászló Takácsn/a20080707
63924.02 secondsTyler FoxHaven't posted in awhile. Just met Justin Vining, Owen Hall kicks butt! 
63924.02 secondsClayne HawleyFinally picked the cube back up and I'm back to memorizing algs. Hopefully the times will continue lowering.20070209
64124.21 secondsAlan ChangAverage around 32 seconds. 
64224.22 secondsFabio FeoMy new record sub-25.20080828
64324.34 secondsCarlos RamartMy video!!20080523
64424.39 secondsSander Hendrickxn/a20051110
64524.40 secondsBrent HaferkampOld school.1983, not lucky, in high school calc class, timed by teacher with stopwatch, no preview, using move intensive solving solution (probably 90-100 moves). My avg then was around 30-35 sec, now using same (bad) method (and only solving 10-20 times a year)is about 40-45.want to learn Fridrich, but at my age don't have the time to dedicate to understanding new system.1983
64624.42 secondsDavid HoggeGetting better all the time..  
64724.45 secondsCleo Davis IVslow compared to others but it is my record hopefully i can improve.the fridrich method helped a lot20060910
64824.47 secondsMichael RingenSlowly improving!!20071220
64924.49 secondsAlexander ZinnWith Very Easy Cube:) My record for now, still beginner F2L20080427
64924.49 secondsMichael TrasenteHadn't cubed for weeks due to not having one. Broke mine XD but ugh got one of my older ones wasn't too bad. Broke my previous record within one day of picking it back up lolz so I guess I didn't lose much skill. =] 200820080607
65124.50 secondsJeff WangHaven't learnt Fridrich OLL and PLL.working on that to get faster20071020
65224.5 secondsJean-Baptiste VincentI use the jiri fridrich method with two steps for the last layer ( orint all, permute all). 
65324.54 secondsTimo KarvonenPetrus-method.20070430
65424.56 secondsDaniel RufenerUsing the timer at rubiks.dk, non-lucky, but well under my average. Fridrich F2L, 3 look LL. Beat my old pr set 4 years ago.20070623
65424.56 secondsSzabolcs Bordasn/a20080828
65624.60 secondsHoward HuangYEAH! i didn't think id be able to get that fast. my average is still in the 30s..20060304
65724.62 secondsAndrew Leungeh. my best solve, no luck =0 i used all of fridrich method, f2l, oll, and pll20071207
65824.64 secondsMika Muranushin/a20061109
65824.64 secondsZuqi Cheni'm a chinese boy. i'm 12 years old.this is my best time before today!20080409
66024.67 secondsKamran JehleNot a lucky solve, just part of an average (of 33.83). This is my best time so far, my avg is just above like 33-34. LIONS (david erani; try and catch this)20041115
66124.69 secondsDan Sealthis is currently my fastest time with no luck. my fastest with luck was 18.35 (skipped PLL). i use friedrich method. hope to have faster times up soon. need to learn more OLL's and faster F2L's.20051126
66224.73 secondsKegham KhosdeghianI didn't even notice this was fast.20080725
66324.75 secondsTaylor Jonesi live in texas and i want to know who in the state is faster than me email me if you are20070816
66424.76 secondsDanny WrightThis wasn't a lucky solve either! Had a 15 second F2L and a 9 second LL. Still gettin' better!20080310
66524.78 secondsSun ParkI broke my record!! 25.83 > 24.7820030301
66624.80 secondsMatt BychowskiAhhh, a nice smooth cube will do wonders for your times.20061221
66624.80 secondsAmit BilgiPretty good solve for me. i do two step PLL and got Sune then 3-corner swap. nice solve overall.20080328
66824.81 secondsAlex ChenMy best non-lucky solve.20080101
66924.84 secondsNeil FleckThis was kinda funny. I was doing an average (with JnetCube) and I was do everything so carelessly and quickly, that I didn't even realize that I had gotten this time until I had posted my average record! Peace out.20060312
66924.84 secondsCameron BriskiNice solve cameron.20070209
67124.87 secondsEirik StrømScramble: R2 U2 B' R L D U' L' U B2 U D2 L B' D' F' R L U R2 D2 F2 R F2 U'
Cross: z R’ U’ x’ y D’
F2L 1: U’ L’ U L
F2L 2: L U’ L’ U L U L’
F2L 3: R U’ R’ U y L’ U L
F2L 4: y L’ U L
OLL: U R U R’ U’ r R’ U R U’ r’
PLL: U’ y2 R U R’ U’ R’ F R2 U’ R’ U’ R U R’ F
My first non-lucky sub 25.
20080206
67224.91 secondsTom Weinreich4-look LL, both PLL skipped if I remember right. This solve was not perfect, which makes it even more exciting.20070418
67324.94 secondsBrandon IlesIt took awhile, but I finally broke 25 seconds! 
67424.98 secondsStefan KodrnjaFinally made it past that illusive wall that is sub 25! By the smallest of margins but still. Timed with Stackmat gen2 timer and using Petrus with 2LLL (OLL/PLL).20050612
67525 secondsRichard Carrn/a 
67525 secondsJulien SanchezVisit my site and the Liste francophone du cube !!! 
67525 secondsLonci Lun/a20080210
67525 secondsHugh GillI was sitting in Spanish class today, doing my Rubik's Cube. When I got finished with it looked at it and set it down the clock said 30-33, so I assume that it was around 25secs., big improvement from my 32 before.20080423
67925.02 secondsBrandon GautierI haven't timed myself in a while.20080317
68025.10 secondsCorentin GrellierLà je me mets à monter coins+côtés en même temps pour les 2 premieres couronnes, alors il va me falloir un peu de temps pour refaire des temps en dessous des 30 sec. 
68025.10 secondsJames MertensFastest non-lucky solve. A timer I made and use.20050305
68225.11 secondsQuinn LewisBeen cubing for 2 months, I'd say this is pretty impressive. 
68325.13 secondsMay Khawn/a20080308
68425.17 secondsEtienne MillonI'm now in the top 20. Next month I will be in the top 10.. 
68525.20 secondsManuel de Jesussigo mejorando espero que los demas speedcubers de mi pais se integren a este site20060227
68625.21 secondsMike TryczakI've had a lot of time to dedicate to cubing recently. The last layer was not particlarly fast, about 10 seconds I think, although the PLL was an edge 3-cycle. The F2L flowed very smoothly though. Once I get the last few LL algorithms down, I'll start concentrating on F2L. 
68725.23 secondsDavid PavlikGuttermouth12346 
68825.25 secondsErik Wallinn/a20050507
68925.28 secondsCloy PlumoR2 U D R2 D F L2 B U D2 R2 F2 B2 D2 R B R' F2 R2 L2 U' F2 R L2 U
Easy F2L. 2 algorithm OLL and 2~ sec PLL.
20080511
69025.31 secondsTimothy Nesherkeep on trying20070820
69125.33 secondsAndrew SturkiePretty easy cross :)20070711
69225.36 secondsChris Tandionocurrently my record. actually i set 2 personal records in one day.20071022
69325.38 secondsBenjamin TitzeNot a lucky case.20030708
69425.41 secondsGergely FarkasI used the Timer 2.1 for this time. After 8 month of cubing. KEEP UP HUNGARY!20051214
69425.41 secondsDavid ShiNo steps skipped, but 1 easy F2L and the OLL and PLL were quite easy. I did this in math class when my classmates and I were bored.20070113
69425.41 secondsMason Newsteadmy record before was a 25.66 with a pll skip. this was non lucky, i had a really fast f2l though. (avg-34)20080729
69725.46 secondsZarqa MalikI can't believe it got this time(non-lucky)..once i actually get all of the algs. for fridrich my times are gonna be fast!!Yay!!!Go Me!!20060329
69825.47 secondsJohnny Auyoungsmooth F2L20071226
69925.48 secondsChristophe GoudeyI want to be faster.
I never use pre-inspection time. See Cubeland
 
69925.48 secondsBorys PielaYeah.!20080108
70125.50 secondsThomas ArnouxIt's an excellent time, but best average is only of 39 seconds. 
70125.50 secondsAntonio Becerraeasy cross and first layer easy middle layer easy oll. I've had some times around 30-40s but I average 35-55s. I'm spanish. my f2l not complete. oll not complete. pll complete.20050925
70125.50 secondsRob SokolowskiYo. I first solved the rubik's cube when I was seven. Now, seven years later and I got 25.5 seconds woohoo!20051217
70425.57 secondsMorten ElleyConverted to Jiri's. You can see this record on www.rubiks.dk 
70525.60 secondsBradley Davisn/a20071102
70625.64 secondsTom Taylorn/a20060426
70725.67 secondsWittawin Ruangsinsathaphonn/a20080727
70825.79 secondsYony VelingardThank the Snake. 
70925.81 secondsElias Johannes List13 years old, Austria, Roux-Method20070801
71025.82 secondsSeiya Andan/a20060614
71025.82 secondsIan Zhengn/a20070717
71225.88 secondsLeonardo MartinezMy personal best. It was an easy cross, but nothing was skipped Average around 35s.20061012
71325.95 secondsJacob WoelmerI used the fridrich method. This wasn't very lucky, but I went pretty quickly through the f2l, and it was an easy oll.20070328
71425.98 secondsPatrick MorabitoThis wasn't a lucky solve.20071011
71526 secondsJonas Moller LarsenI guess average times are more relevant. My best average of ten is 32.90 seconds. 
71526 secondsJason HildebrandAverage is about 40. 
71526 secondsMichael ByrneDone a few years ago. I'm getting slower in my old age. 
71526 secondsClint GaskinThis is my best ever time (early 1980's school champion) however I have just returned to the cube and am averaging 60 seconds slow I know but I am working on some new algorithms.20051021
71526 secondsRichard Jamesdid this in the car on way to baseball game easy t oll and pll was J20070531
71526 secondsEugene KwokNot technically lucky. Still did all the steps.20080523
72126.02 secondsMichael SkaleckiThis was an extremely fortunate case (for 'Fridrich' method). The cross was extremely obvious (3-4 moves) and I never once had to pause to find a pair in the F2L (and none took more than 6 moves to place) giving me a nice sub-17s F2L. Then I got my favorite corners only orientation case (I use a "2.5" step LL when speed cubing and this time it was 2 steps) and then a quick Sune to completion (I REALLY need to speed this LL up.). 
72226.07 secondsNick Treadawaymy fastest yet!!! really fast f2l My website with the video20070603
72226.07 secondsRaymond ChardRoux solve lucky skipped orientation of corners and a one look 6 edge solve!!20080229
72426.10 secondsOscar KubikMy second non-lucky time under 30 seconds. 
72426.10 secondsBryant Trandad timed at a restaurant with my stopwatch. I had gotten 24 seconds the day before but not using a stopwatch by partygoer's accounts so I'm happy i could actually record a more than .35 second under 30 sec. time.20050727
72626.16 secondsJustin Tardiffafter about 5 months cubing on and off I finnally reached my goal of sub-30 seconds!
Thanks Mike and Jason for your support!
20060510
72726.17 secondsJonathan Winnn/a 
72826.28 secondsJohannes BuckJust a lucky time!20061111
72926.30 secondsCarlos Castillo my fastest time without any kind of skips20080511
73026.37 secondsJilvin TempletonO. M..G
Fastest solve BY FAR I had 5 sub 40s in a row!!!
37.71 36.03 35.04! 34.00!! 31.23!!!
Then finally 26.37!!!
Then 42.12 lol
20070608
73126.39 secondsSam Cappleman-LynesMy avg. is about 40 secs. This was not lucky, but faster execution and recognition than normal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GjT-1iGfXg
20071117
73226.4 secondsPedro CamposIn the last 3 months I learned PLL and F2L and got from 65 to 26s to win a bet ;) I think I'll take a little break from cubing. 
73326.41 secondsAlex Tarasiukn/a20071225
73426.44 secondsTerje KristensenAbout time I got a PB, since my avg have gone down 10 sec since my last one.20031109
73526.48 secondsIngo Terhorstn/a20070315
73526.48 secondsYuming Dinglucky solve sorta.skipped PLL20070412
73726.50 secondsSteve KorolukNo luck. F2L went by very fast. No pauses, I just saw things before I even had to think. It was smooth and fast. 
73726.50 secondsAssaf Yifrach÷åáéä äåðâøéú ôúøåï - My Website
I done this record using my poor old bad cube (not a cube made for speedcubing).
20071208
73726.50 secondsEdward Kwoknon lucky, no skips, just an OLL i knew and easy PLL20080111
73726.50 secondsJoseph Stallardthis solve was pretty fast.
go to youtube.com and search for my video named joseph stallard
20080701
74126.53 secondsDaniel FleaI average in the 40's but occasionally get times in the 20's. I switched to using Jessica's f2l method a few weeks ago and my best time nearly cut in half. I have 3 more algs to learn on the 3-look LL. 
74126.53 secondsArnaud CabesFridrich Method, with a very easy cross.20060108
74126.53 secondsTaylor Lemmdone with the speedcubing timer and scrambling algorithm20061217
74426.54 secondsEric SaeturnPetrus method and CFOP method combined20080113
74526.55 secondsShane Greenfast but slow20080503
74626.57 secondsJeff SoesbeFirst set when switching from 4-step LL to 3-step results in a nice quick 3-step solve and a personal best!20070121
74626.57 secondsPawan Dhananjayn/a20080317
74826.59 secondsPeck Ern-WeiErn-Min and Ern-Wen are my lovely brothers20080727
74926.65 secondsCharlie ConleyBeat my old record! Finally. Now I need to get down to a sub-30 average.20080813
75026.66 secondsAdam BensonJust got back into cubing, time going down all the time. 
75126.72 secondsBrennan MartinSPEED '4' LIFE 
75126.72 secondsKeith ClancyUsing a DIY Cube and the Jess Bond timer. Yesterday (4/10/05) I did a similar time (26.96) using a Game Cube (the one with plastic tiles and peg holes) also on the Jess Bond timer. I still need to do more work on the F2L and PLL. I'm more frequently averaging in the high 30's/low 40's but still get the odd slow post 1 minute shockers when I make mistakes but I am making slow progress. Cheers Keith in Australia.20050820
75326.73 secondsZach Steinn/a20071201
75426.75 secondsJoel Tani needed to rush to the toilet and i was lucky, maybe that should be a constant tactic to speed. haha.(:20071011
75526.82 secondsAaron ZhaoI want Sub-20!! :(20070529
75526.82 secondsNicolas Guerini do a methode interesé20080627
75726.84 secondsWissarut Sakulpaptongn/a20080408
75826.89 secondsRobin GunneyUsing Lars Petrus method and timed with a stackmat timer whilst I was waiting for some rice to cook, Still had less than 10 sub 30's but I'm getting faster all the time!! Usually averaging in the late 30's. 9/10/0720071011
75926.90 secondsRobert HomayoonMy first sub-30 solve with a new black DIY Rubik's Cube. Looking to learn the 3x3 4x4 or 5x5 cubes? Check out my tutorials on my channel! Rob's YouTube Channel for Rubik's Enthusiasts20080701
76026.96 secondsAustin ReedYes!!!!YESYESYES!!! Sub-30! I've been working hard for that!!!20080121
76127 secondsMédéric de VincellesI did this time last week. It is my best time for the moment. I usually turn around 36 sec. Not lucky. 
76127 secondsDan LewisVery lucky time. Usually around 40 sec.20050113
76127 secondsRyan TurnerUsed the beginner solution layer by layer. Only had to insert two pieces on the second layer. The entire solve was so easy and smooth that it makes me want to say that the entire solve was lucky. Some of it was lucky but mostly just easy cases. To sum up I was just completely on fire!20050323
76127 secondsTony BianchiIt took me a while to get here but now on a regular basis I manage to get below 30 seconds. My average is around 40 seconds but once and a while a nice low one like this slips through. I don't think I will be able to maintain below 30 seconds consistently, but I keep trying. See my solution.20050503
76127 secondsTim TilstraMy first sub 30 solve. I'm very excited!20070123
76127 secondsCharles Huynhn/a20080126
76127 secondsJames KempFirst time under 30s. Got a lucky solve, rotated last 3 corners and they fell into place.20080414
76827.01 secondsCJ Robinsoni was at the Florida Open started off real bad high 40's then i got into the 30's consistantly and i just got 27 out of no where pretty lucky scramble!20070416
76927.13 secondsLoïc Jançonméthode base20071117
76927.13 secondsJohn Louiswow! I am improving! Thanks to all cubers for your inspiration.20080227
77127.16 secondsChristopher Chan20051125
77227.19 secondsChris DresslerI got nothin'. 
77327.29 secondsBrian WardHey, I'm in 8th grade and I've been practicing for 3 years. If you think I cheated go to http://solvingrubikscubes.tripod.com 
77427.30 secondsTom CassidyMy first sub 30 solve, i was really amazed when i did it 20071011
77527.31 secondsTerence Andrianthe most lucky cube i've never seen ;)20060924
77627.38 secondsMohd Firdaus Bin Shahrinlayer-by-layer method with 3 look last layer (orient edges and corners,permute last layer)20080118
77727.41 secondsNate McKerveyMy fastest lucky time was done at the Louisville Science Center. I solved it in front of a bunch of kids in 7 seconds. I was just as surprised as them! My fastest non-lucky record is 27.41 seconds. 
77827.48 secondsScott StephensonI got this in spite of my rubik's wrist. I had an easy cross and I saw all of the F2L chunks one right after the other then flew through the rest. MartyMania20080227
77927.50 secondsTim GodfreeI'll admit I had a bit of luck, but hey, I still made it in under 30 seconds! 
77927.50 secondsScott SatkinHi Mom! 
78127.55 secondsFrank Freemanfinally, sub 30. still averaging like 47 seconds, got lucky on F2L20060705
78227.56 secondsMichael JungF L2 B2 D L B' U2 D2 R' F' B' U' L2 R' B2 D' F' B' D2 L' R' F2 U' D R20070529
78327.65 secondsTaylor HoulihanNon-lucky, I didn't happen to have the scramble. Right before this I got 27.66, ha ha.20070507
78427.70 secondsMatt TruongU R2 U D2 B F L2 F' D L U L U D' F' B2 L B2 R L' U F2 U' B' R2
Non-lucky. I use 3-look last layer. Sub-30 after a month of cubing! Thanks to my teacher Shelley Chang.
20060826
78527.71 secondsAndrew DrakeTimed with J-Net Cube using the Lars Petrus method. 25-09-07 20070927
78627.72 secondsAndrey Aleninn/a20050822
78627.72 secondsCarlo TripodiAfter a month of hard practice, today I did my first two times under 30sec and this is the best!20080127
78827.73 secondsAndrew ChoiMy average is around 37 seconds right now. This is the only nonlucky sub30 solve I've ever gotten.20071028
78927.74 secondsAndrew Webbern/a20070222
79027.87 secondsAntonino VilardiNot bad ;)Italian Rubik's cube group20061027
79127.89 secondsMarc Piche? 
79227.97 secondsEdward HouseThis was my second sub 30 solve.20080423
79328.00 secondsJesse PhamLol. My fastest solve ever! :D20080110
79428 secondsBen Leblondn/a 
79428 secondsChris FieldI average about 40 seconds. I've had a couple of really fast times, but 28 seconds is the fastest that I have timed. 
79428 secondsJan BalharNot a lucky (Lucky case 24 seconds). I have been practising two months. Only 25 algorithms! I 'll be the best cuber in Prague :-) 
79428 secondsJohn BoydDid in 1982 in the middle of the jungle in PNG.1982
79428 secondsJoel Waas Smithn/a20080430
79428 secondsLudwig FichteMy first non-lucky sub30 solve. I was so going crazy when I realized the time! so far my best solve has been 32 seconds.
Cross was about 5 moves, pretty easy F2L cases and my favorite OLL and PLL situation. sub20 here I come ;-)
20080627
79428 secondsZack LeeI've been working on some new algs and they payed off giving me my fastest time ever. This was not a lucky solve.20080806