Rubik's Cube
1-200, 201-400, 401-600, 601-800, 801-1000, 1001-1200, 1201-1400, 1401-1600, 1601-1800, 1801-2000, 2001-2200, 2201-2400
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
20113.65 secondsNico ElaydaMy first solve under 15. Easy case but not lucky.
Scramble (cross color on top):U2 F L2 B' F' D B2 D' R B F D' L' D' L R' D U2 R D2 U' L2 R' F' R2
Video
20080304
20213.66 secondsParker Gaitleybarely beat my previous record. during average of 10020051022
20313.69 secondsZach Dodgedomination. with a incomplete oll20070616
20413.74 secondsAdam ZamoraI dont normally practice with computer generated scrambles but this day I was. here is the scramble. D' L' D' F U' B' D' U' F U' F' U2 F2 D L B U F L B' U' L R' U2 R'. White up green front. I solve yellow first xcross easy solve all around. 48 moves. 3.49 moves per second20070329
20513.77 secondsTyler AlbrightThis is my first non-lucky sub-14. Yayyy20080704
20613.80 secondsNathaniel Christianan average cross but a smooth slow/quick F2l. I had edges bar plus a righty G for the last layer. This will probably be the last personal best I break in this category. I honestly have no idea how I did this but I guess the stackmat doesn't lie.(LIONS)20051128
20613.80 secondsAndrew ChowAmazing F2L. Nice LL.20061030
20813.83 secondsJoshua Lin/a20070822
20913.85 secondsJohn Chenhttp://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=J6_uMs3SMn420071112
20913.85 secondsBaiheng ChenMy fastest solve..but it's lucky20080409
21113.88 secondsJon Weidleyvery nice solve and it was not lucky!20080503
21213.94 secondsJosh Bergi couldnt believe when i got this time!!! nonlucky too!!! i average more like 26 but this solve was just a really smooth f2l, easy oll, and i think a 3 cycle.20070822
21313.95 secondsOlivér Perge6 moves extended cross, two easy F2L, one normal and favourite OLL and PLL. I'm so excited!!! :D20070305
21413.98 secondsMaarten Stoelhorstthis was by far the most smoothest solve i ever did! i got a little bit lucky on the LL though: my favorite OLL and PLL without any setup moves. still my F2l was really fast20051220
21413.98 secondsEmile CompionR D' R D' L R F' R' F' R' B' D L' U' B U' B R F U D' L2 B' L U
Scramble white on U, green on F. You'll probably PB too :)
20071112
21614.00 secondsArthur AdamsNice!
Scramble: L B2 L B' F' L2 D U2 L' B2 U' F' U F2 U2 F' U' F L2 R2 B L R2 B F2
Cross: z y' U R U' R2
F2L-1: z R U' R' U'
F2L-2: y R U2' R' U' R U R'
F2L-3: y U2 R U R' U R' U R
F2L-4: U R U R'
OLL: U2 r U R' U R U2' r'
PLL: U R2' u R' U R' U' R u' R2 y' R' U R
20080828
21714 secondsKen TeraoNon-lucky 
21714 secondsMatt Wildern/a 
21914.03 secondsJoey GoulyL2 D' B2 D' R' B2 L2 D2 L2 R D2 F' R2 L D U2 R' U D' B' U' D' F R2 B
Wow! I excited!! I was just about to post a 16.61, which I got yesterday, then I beat that by 2s! I average around 23-24!
20070701
22014.07 secondsMartin ZahradníkIt's nice! :-)20071201
22114.08 secondsAaron McGhieX cross in about 4 moves but other than that it was a completely normal solve. Lucky or no??20070709
22214.15 secondsDaniel DumaJust a really smooth solve.20051222
22214.15 secondsCameron Almasiyeah20080426
22414.18 secondsTyson MaoD' F B2 U B2 L2 F' L' D R2 F2 U L B2 U2 D2 R D' L2 D' L2 B' F2 U' B' This solve goes to William McCabe. My Website.20040903
22414.18 secondsAlexei GousevThis was a really, really smooth solve, easy F2L, T OLL, and 3 edge cycle. First solve in my 18.93 average.20070620
22414.18 secondsMichael SwanWaterman method. Not a lucky case but I knew every case I ran into in this solve. Am I the fastest in the world who uses corners first? (I average 22 seconds)20080926
22714.20 secondsErik DuncanVery nice.20071112
22814.23 secondsKyle AgerFor this solve I used my newly learnt Fridrich method. These sort of times are starting to become more common for me. This solve was done while one of my fellow classmates timed it. Also I got a very easy LL.20050610
22814.23 secondsKacper PawlaczykDone after a very long break, hence quite proub of the result :-p [PSF member]20060417
23014.25 secondsKĺre KrigFound X-cross from inspection and modified it on the fly to set up for a really easy second pair.20070115
23114.28 secondsJean PonsVery good F2L , easy LL . 
23214.34 secondsSantiago Mansillanew cube! no tengo mucho tiempo para practicar. Nothing more to say20060422
23314.48 secondsAbel BrataMy fastest nonlucky solve.for now :)20061122
23414.50 secondsPablo Ruiz CamposUn solo tiempo significa nada, no descansare hasta que este sea mi promedio.20060223
23514.5 secondsJackson Lynchwasnt very hard.I use a corners method.just all the steps went really easy. I screwed up filling in the 2 opposite and ended up with something I know how to solve. 
23614.52 secondsAlex WalkerA full Fridrich solve: Cross- 1 F2l-7 OLL-3 PLL-3.520050701
23614.52 secondsWinston Kohn/a20080828
23614.52 secondsKarl Moritzsorry i have many scrambles saved and i dont know which one it was. but i think it was this one: B2 L2 U R2 F' L R D U L' R2 U R2 B F D2 U2 B R' F L U2 L' R2 F
its very easy but fullstep
20081010
23914.53 secondsErlend EngelsgjerdMy first sub-15 sec solve! Even though it was a PLL skip I am very satisfied of reaching sub 15 seconds! This inspires me to work more with my moves and my 'look-ahead'!!20051003
24014.59 secondsBrian LeFINALLY! Sub-15.20071011
24114.63 secondsTom HarmanFastest non-lucky solve- cool F2L, no edge OLL, G Perm20080711
24214.65 secondsLucas GarronSub-15; I was never expecting that with a non-"lucky" solve; it was very fortunate, though.
Reconstruction
Video (It'll also be on YouTube soon)
20070305
24314.72 secondsMariusz SudzikMy first sub 15! Non Lucky Cases. Fastest LC 11.34sec.20050716
24414.77 secondsAnton RostovikovNon lucky. My best lucky result was 13.36a20080724
24514.83 secondsGrzegorz LuczynaNon-LC.20060511
24514.83 secondsChristopher FosterDone at the Las Vegas McCarran Airport on December 28th. This is part of my PB average.
B' L2 U L' F' R' B2 F2 U R' L F R' F2 R' D2 B' L2 R2 D2 U B' R' U D2
20071228
24714.87 secondsLars PetrusQuicktime video 
24814.88 secondsMike BennettGetting faster finally. This won't be up for long, I would imagine.20051113
24914.90 secondsJason KovacicRoux method, all steps. 15-16 sec solves are more common now.20071026
25014.91 secondsRyan KnaptonAll Steps. WHAT A RUSH! 
25114.97 secondsJesse Harpereverything went smooth.20070430
25214.98 secondsSimon LancasterA non-lucky time: all four corner/edge pairs to be inserted; orientation "29" and permutation "F" on Jessica's page. 
25214.98 secondsPatrick KellyTimed on stackmat, did full Fridrich, F2L, OLL, PLL.20061220
25214.98 secondsAlexander YuF U R2 L U2 B2 U F L2 D F' U F R D2 L2 U F' U F D2 R' L2 D U is the scramble alg. Barely any delay in between steps :)20070816
25514.99 secondsChris SzlatenyiSuper fast solve including a quick 5 move non matching pair and an awesome 19 move LL--Not Lucky.20040729
25615.00 secondsBen Seversonsame time as my last fastest, but my last one had no pll, this one did. I'm shooting for an average of about 15, so this is a step in the right direction.20080505
25715 secondsRyan PatricioThis was not a lucky case. Lighthing fast F2L, but a realy slow LL.20050105
25715 secondsLouie Davidn/a20080322
25915.02 secondsScott Bellhttp://thesixfaces.wordpress.com20081012
26015.06 secondsGeorgina RobbinsYAY!! Yeah it wasnt lucky jst a good solve cos i used RU finger tricks alot.
i've nearly subed 20 avg!!
20080423
26115.12 secondsLe HoangYESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS lol practice pays off wow..i cant beleive i got this time XD very smooth f2l saw an extended cross then but in each f2l normally but for some reason i did it fast and looked ahead ( i normally cant do this) lol and then nice regular oll and pll to finish =D yay so happy20080330
26215.15 secondsDavid ShiCame with the 42 cube marathon.20081029
26315.21 secondsOtto von HellensReally smooth F2L and LL was just sune and U-perm. The cross was just a bit slow (3-4sec).20080701
26415.24 secondsNathaniel DaySub-20 Average soon!20050704
26415.24 secondsTodd BakerU' F2 R' L2 F D' L R' U2 L' D U2 L U2 L' U' L U' L' F U2 R' D2 R L
Easy X-cross + easy F2L. One of the shortest OLL's and U' Perm
20080206
26615.25 secondsBen MarxMy best non-lucky solve. Although I was lucky in that almost every step had an algorithm that I am very fast at.20060904
26615.25 secondsGrzegorz DzikieiwiczYeah
easy cross
F2l without regriping
OLL + PLL Quick )
anything lucky just no delays just smoothly
20080523
26815.30 secondsLeonardo TambelliniConsegui observar um par na hora que eu estava olhando a cruz OLL e PLL fáceis.
=D
20080304
26915.33 secondsBĺrd Ove Hoelhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwZ8WKU6TQU
its all there.
F2 L' U' D2 F' R D' F' R L2 D2 U2 L U' L' D B' U' L2 D' U' B2 U2 D L'
try this and get PB:D
20080731
27015.35 secondsCharles BouchartIt wasn't a lucky time (my best lucky is 13.97sec), just a perfect solve !! My site. 
27115.37 secondsKrishanu Roy SankarI've gotten many lucky 15s, and a couple non-lucky ones. This one was easy, efficient, and smooth. I decided to time a few solves with my watch at one point and got this. It was a while ago, so I'm not exactly sure how it went, but the F2L was done in few moves with easy situations, 2 edges to orient (i use petrus with fridrich LL), and LL was proably something like sune+L or sune+edge switcher or something along those lines like (doublesunedoublecornerswitchingalgorithm which I made up+edge switcher). (Lions)20050621
27215.41 secondsGilles van den PeereboomI had to do it twice to make sure I wasn't dreaming. :-)20050820
27215.41 secondsOuyang Yunqin/a20080930
27415.43 secondsMats ValkSorry Jacco20080312
27515.45 secondsJuan Manuel Grados Luyandohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0D0CGQJwqc20081012
27615.50 secondsJoseph LiaoNon-Lucky Case, Done in my 2nd sub-20 average, it was a 4 move cross (I think) and the 4 F2L's were the easier ones, a Fish Pattern, and a G Permutation~ My site. 
27615.50 secondsYunZhu LiNot lucky My Blog20080118
27615.50 secondsDaniel Siguero GarciaIt isn't a great thing, but I did it playing a Jnet with David Calvo. My previous record was 17.11 second. The record is skipping PLL.20080209
27615.50 secondsEdmond Limn/a20080816
28015.52 secondsTrevor HollandNot lucky, everything just lined up correctly and I was looking ahead quite a ways. 
28115.53 secondsEnrique Floreseverything went so good.. U' L' B' R' B L F' B2 U D B' D' F2 R' U2 R2 U' L2 D' F2 B2 D' B' F' D220080328
28215.55 secondsFelix KungScramble (White on top green on front): L' B R2 F R' F2 L2 R D2 U' R' D' U L R' B F2 D U L' R' D U' F2 U
Cross: x2 y F R' L' U B2 D2 (6)
I don't remember how I did the rest. . =D
20080820
28315.58 secondsYuzuru MishimaIt was a comfortable flow.My Website20070124
28415.60 secondsRyan UtterL2 R2 B2 D U2 L' B' R B' F L2 R' F2 U B2 R' B' F' U' L' R' D U2 B' F was the scramble.20080627
28515.61 secondsAdam WojtylaThis is a result for consolation because earlier I had LC sub11 without PLL:) I did this time on the GATO cube.20060513
28615.62 secondsRoss PalmerThough most of the moves that I performed were among my fastest, technically this was not a lucky time as I performed the extent of my solution method, skipping no steps. 
28715.64 secondsDavid EraniThis was right after a 46 second solve where i had to recall the N. Really easy five move extended cross. Two easy pairs then three moves for the last pair. 'The good L' and a right-handed G. Not lucky but way too easy. Still have two or three Lions to catch.20051029
28715.64 secondsBrian Nicole UyPhilippine Cubers Association20071215
28915.66 secondsFernando M. F. NogueiraFantastic solve, I was looking at the cube and planning moves 1 step ahead all the time, working hard to improve until november 2005.20041224
29015.67 secondsShuichi Katsumatasupper fast. well for me20060614
29115.69 secondsWillie Siausunday contest. fullstep.20080926
29215.70 secondsMike Boegemann/a20051009
29315.73 secondsSim Tae-YongIt's a lucky case20060904
29315.73 secondsMarco Hemkencheeah boiee!!20070616
29315.73 secondsJonathan AdlamJust a really perfect solve! Easy to solve cross some nice F2L cases one of my favourite OLL and then a T-Perm. Lovely feeling when it comes down. AVG at the time =about 23 seconds20080926
29615.75 secondsMichael AtkinsonMy best time using the Roux method, which is now my main speedsolving system. Started learning it about a month ago, and have dropped my average to 24.29 seconds so far.20050506
29715.80 secondsShelley ChangMy fastest non-lucky solve, done on my new stackmat.20070430
29815.83 secondsPhilip ThomasFastest video solve. [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfrNOytIk2c[/url]20070530
29915.90 secondsJustin Ruebushn/a20060123
30015.91 secondsLoic CharpentierThis is my best time without lucky case.20050122
30115.94 secondsSzabolcs Bordasn/a20081021
30215.95 secondsTimothy Hon/a20071019
30315.97 secondsJohn TranI have been working on this Rubik's Cubes for over 12 years now.20070307
30415.98 secondsYeom Seok HoonNo lucky case. 
30515.99 secondsPeter GreenwoodWell, these records arent lasting for more than a few days.
Part of my NEW avg. Maybe I'll get one of these at Rutgers? :)
[Team Epsilon] My Website
20070421
30515.99 secondsThomas ClementAlright sub 16. Ultra smooth solve FURU'R'F' OLL and T PLL. Sub 15 here I come.20080915
30716.00 secondsAntoine Simon-Chautemps:o)20070415
30816 secondsKumar DeepThis was a nearly perfect solution for me. I saw ahead on every f2l and had an 8-move orientation and 15 move perm. It felt really good! Not lucky. 
30816 secondsDave Orsern/a20020912
30816 secondsPatrick Brookern/a 
30816 secondsAngelo Talbann/a20080814
30816 secondsRupert Ledesmaspeedcubing20080814
31316.06 secondsAndrew Smithomg, this is a phenomenal time for me!20080502
31416.09 secondsMichiel van der BlonkFinally, one year later I took one second off.. Yeah! 
31516.12 secondsTravis WaddellThis was done after I lubricated my cube very well with silicon spray lubricant.20041227
31516.12 secondsTyler WilkinsonWow.20070503
31716.20 secondsGerard PaapuFaster than my fastest lucky solve. "Petrich" method
2x2x3 was insanely fast bad edges was normal F2L was normal
OLL was Evelyn PLL was Niklas + Sune
Fastest in NZ?
20061113
31816.23 secondsJonathan HenageThis time was not very lucky, but I don't think I could match it again. I usually solve it in 21-25 seconds. 
31816.23 secondsBrian EdwardsDid it at school. Used timer at cubetimer.com. I use my own custom method.Cross, F2L, Corners, Edges.20080411
32016.24 secondsPatrick LamUsed Netcube for this solve. First three pairs easy. Fast OLL and PLL. I average around 30 seconds so this is pretty good :) Hopefully I'll get a sub 20 average in the next few months.20051115
32116.25 secondsBenoît FontaineNon lucky ^^video20051121
32216.27 secondsMatt Wallisan/a20060123
32316.30 secondsKen Heiretn/a 
32416.31 secondsDavid SkolnikSub-17! Easy easy easy solve. Sweet.20060516
32416.31 secondsDaniel ChanThis was part of my 24 second average. I had gotten a 17 and 19 before in the same session and was freaking out. Then this 16 came and I just about defied gravity. Great F2L that lead into an OLL case that I knew(I learned everything except for 32 OLLs) which helped my time alot. Been cubing for a little over 3 months now and I'm happy with this. :)20070608
32616.34 secondsJeremy GurewitzIt took me 100 tries in a row using a random mixer but i did it unfortunately the lens cap was on my camera at the time so I do not have a video.20051225
32616.34 secondsNick Malosjust a smooth f2l and easy last layer20071031
32816.38 secondsCory HarnishNew personal best non lucky case used f2l then 3 look last layer. now trying to learn olls so this could be my avg. 
32916.39 secondsKoen HeltzelWhile practising on-stage, the day before the European Rubiks Games Championships 2004. Non-lucky, just easy cases.20030822
33016.43 secondsWuqiong FanI'm not sure if I posted this already. I didn't expect the time to be this fast. But of course, I should really be averaging around this time if my F2L is more consistent.20080627
33116.44 secondsSteven ShawScramble:D R2 U' B' L B' R' F2 R2 U2 R L B R B U' L D' B R U2 R2 U' R2 F'
easy cross F2L. Full step.
20080110
33216.50 secondsCorey Dufordn/a 
33216.50 secondsCsaba Soósn/a20080926
33416.51 secondsChris Chann/a20070923
33516.52 secondsMartin Parnon lucky, t oll and j perm20080210
33616.53 secondsRichard Kimthis is my best recorded time that was not lucky20070819
33616.53 secondsAnker PeetThis is Gangsta!!!20080304
33816.56 secondsErik JohnsonI used petrus to get this time. I got the F2L together very quickly and didn't have to move my hands the do the OLL. Then the PLL was a 3 corner swap. 20060721
33816.56 secondsMikee Floresn/a20080717
34016.61 secondsYinJia QiuDid a great job looking ahead for the F2L, plus got easy OLL and PLL. Chinese Pride (DBHS). 
34116.62 secondsJon Santosnot a lucky case.20080417
34216.64 secondsJeff AndrewI havn't cubed since March 06. This was pretty unexpected.20060821
34316.65 secondsDavid AguilaAverage is in the low 20's but eventually hope it will be around here 15.xx as soon as I can get a 15 20070102
34416.67 secondsBarnabás Erdélyin/a20061215
34516.69 secondsRoger SolemaF2L was done fast (for my standards lol) and got the easiest LL possible lol ^_^!20070105
34616.70 secondsBrantley MillsThis solve was great. The F2L went very smooth and was probably under 10 seconds. The LL was just average.20061110
34716.71 secondsAdam Dargann/a20080101
34816.72 secondsRaul GarciaLooking ahead. (Jaspers). 
34816.72 secondsMáté MüllerIt wasn't lucky, just good.20070519
35016.73 secondsMichael Chungn/a20080104
35116.78 secondsCraig BouchardDid this on the bus to my Ski Trip.using partial corner control for OLL.Easy solve.very easy, not long after got a 17.50.20060213
35216.82 secondsThomas BischofDone at the Caltech Spring 2005 Competition Solution was 55 moves using full Fridrich, and not lucky, yet 3 seconds better than and time I've done before.20050416
35216.82 secondsCindy Transthis happened when i was all depressed in my room, too. i was totally surprised. nowadays, i can get sub-20's once in a while, but i'm still working on it to beat this record!! mwahaha.20071117
35416.86 secondsTim ReynoldsThree days ago I broke 20 seconds for the first time.now sub-17! L B F' L F B L F R2 D' F L D' R2 B2 U' B F' D' F2 D2 B2 D U' R' double x-cross in 6 moves [y F' U' y F' U' R U' y2 F' R2], then 1 simple f2l pair and one not too-bad one, then easy oll and y-perm. Really easy solve, but done well.20060326
35416.86 secondsYu Yang HsiehUsed THE ULTIMATE RUBIK'S CUBE TIMER.20060803
35416.86 secondsGoh Jing Minn/a20080828
35716.87 secondsKai Xiangnice solve for me20080607
35816.88 secondsKyle Rinescramble:
B2D'F2R2B'F2L'R2BL2F2U2R'F'C'L2U'BRB2R2F2L2D2L
20080910
35916.89 secondsAdam ZietaraNon-Lucky Case, very easy F2L, favorite OLL and PLL.20050204
36016.90 secondsDylan FryeHoly CRAP. This was so amazing I don't even know how it happened. My previous record was 20 seconds and I just got this amazing solve. I don't think I would say it was lucky just easy. I AM SO EXCITED!!!20080721
36116.91 secondsJarek Nowickiwithout LC.20050624
36216.92 secondsJimmy CollNot lucky, it's very good for me.20060116
36316.94 secondsHeath LittonDon't know where that came from.not lucky..20031205
36316.94 secondsJosh RotholzThis solve really surprised me! I did it with my brand new DIY cube I got yesterday. It was weird, I was cubing and doing well, everything was normal, nothing lucky, then I hit my hands on the stackmat and the display reads 16.94! I figured it would be like 21 or so, but I was wrong! 20080207
36516.99 secondsErik JernqvistWell, since that 29.11 time has been here I while, I decided to post a better time, heck I avarage faster than that nowadays.20060212
36516.99 secondsAlan Nguyenwasnt really a lucky case. Just easy to execute an extended-cross for. but this is 4 seconds faster than my avg.20061122
36717 secondsDavid PagisMay the cube be with you. 
36717 secondsSuehiro KondoNot including lucky cases. Including lucky cases is 15 seconds. 
36717 secondsJustin ViningSlowly but surely!
My site.
 
36717 secondsChristine LaiIt was due to the pressure of a competition. No, not a cube competition.20050312
36717 secondsDennis BreukerThis was in 1982. I was then averaging about 23 sec. Currently (after over 20 years not cubing) my average is about 34 sec.1982
37217.01 secondsMichel Chabaneixfast lucky extended cross. easy f2l, fast oll, slow pll :) NEW Pb WOOT!!20080514
37317.04 secondsAlessandro FlatiOne of my best results.. not very lucky, simply all alghoritms that i love :D
P.s. I'm italian, sorry for my bad english ^^
20080331
37417.07 secondsDevin GordonReally good solve for me. Got it after coming home from a trip. I usually average around 25.20080814
37517.13 secondsGarrett DickersonThis was my fastest solve in my fastest average to date. Hopefully this time will go down once I learn more than 6 or 7 LL algs, hah.20070217
37617.14 secondsTy Fentonjust lucky, somehow i got away with out doing OLL..still, ive only been cubing for 3 months20070204
37717.25 secondsMarcin Jakubowski:)20080130
37817.26 secondsBrad SampsonIt was a sweet solve, non-lucky. While Training for the Utah Open.20080429
37917.27 secondsAndrea SantambrogioMy best for now20080903
38017.30 secondsSullivan Savoyinin/a20080117
38117.33 secondsEnric GrauR D2 B2 F2 R L F2 R2 B2 R2 U' B F' L' F' R L' F2 R F' B R2 B' U' D
i didnt knew the first OLL xd then i got the SUN with PLL skip.
No sabia el primer oll despues me salio el SUN con PLL skip.
chilerubik.com!
20080915
38217.41 secondsPutti OrungrochkulGreat!20080607
38317.48 secondsBartosz BieleckiIt was OK but not perfect.20070209
38417.53 secondsZack MorrisonWas having a cubing session with a couple buddies. Was having a pb average of about mid 20's and then out of nowhere I slam down a 17.53. Next goal is sub 20 average :p20080312
38517.55 secondsUmar Qattani was just scrambling my cube with the coputor and had quick f2l 2 look oll and fast pll. this is my pb20071209
38517.55 secondsDavid Gugln/a20080426
38717.60 secondsRodrigo Ybarrausing fridrich.
not luck
scramble : F' D' U F2 L' R2 B L' B2 D' F2 U2 F' R2 D B' F R2 L D2 L' F L' B2 D2
20080408
38817.66 secondsHans van der ZijdenNon lucky and no pre inspection.20080808
38917.70 secondsWynne Chyouafter nearly a year of cubing, not much practicing, though. Cross took only 3 turns, one pair was already set after 1 turn, and i did 3 regular F2L moves, and OLL and edge switch PLL. perfect.20050525
39017.84 secondsCyrille CornuFast F2L, OLL:Sune, PLL:T
Still learning & training OLL/PLL .
20070716
39117.85 secondsRyno KotzeI guess i'm the only oak in South Africa that can do it this fast, cause there is no other south africans i know that can even finish the cube. If you are a south african that can do the cube please drop me a mail as raven-coder@ravemail.co.za 
39217.90 secondsAlex VersterNon lucky.20080206
39317.91 secondsMike DeGrafftook about 8 months off of cubing. like riding a bike.20081007
39417.93 secondsTim Chong12)17.93 - D L' R2 F' L2 B2 R B' D2 R' B' L' B F' R2 B F U' B2 U B' D U B' L'
I kind of went for an extended cross type plan I presereved an F2L pair and that cut off a couple of seconds for this new PB.
20080812
39517.39 secondsDavide Macrin/a20080926
39617.94 secondsCristiano AlbaI use the Petrus method!20070402
39718.00 secondsOmas Abdullahfourth time i hit 1820080130
39718.00 secondsMason NewsteadI got to class. Did a few solves in the high 20's. the kid next to me was like hey i'll time you. I told him to count 15 seconds for me as I inspected. it was like a 6 move cross. then one of my fastest F2L's ever. I think right after my cross there was one already made then When I put that one in it made another and the last two I saw right away. Then it was the T for the OLL and i actually dont remember if it was a PLL skip or not. I dont think it was. whatever it was my PLL was really fast. haha. Right as i finished i looked at him and he was like dude! 18! and i just went nuts and shouted 2 my friend across the room and then my teacher took my cube away i didnt even care I was so excited. and then a minute later I just pulled out another one!20081016
39918 secondsYuri PertsovskiMeasured with a regular clock.20040629
39918 secondsJoe Ted Nguyenthis was nuts for me, 13 secs to the LL and the LL took 5 more secs20070326