Rubik's Cube
1-200, 201-400, 401-600, 601-800, 801-1000, 1001-1200, 1201-1400, 1401-1600, 1601-1800, 1801-2000, 2001-2200, 2201-2400
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
80027.50 secondsScott SatkinHi Mom! 
80227.55 secondsFrank Freemanfinally, sub 30. still averaging like 47 seconds, got lucky on F2L20060705
80327.56 secondsMichael JungF L2 B2 D L B' U2 D2 R' F' B' U' L2 R' B2 D' F' B' D2 L' R' F2 U' D R20070529
80427.60 secondsRyan JewStill The Beginners Method.20080915
80527.65 secondsTaylor HoulihanNon-lucky, I didn't happen to have the scramble. Right before this I got 27.66, ha ha.20070507
80627.70 secondsMatt TruongU R2 U D2 B F L2 F' D L U L U D' F' B2 L B2 R L' U F2 U' B' R2
Non-lucky. I use 3-look last layer. Sub-30 after a month of cubing! Thanks to my teacher Shelley Chang.
20060826
80727.71 secondsAndrew DrakeTimed with J-Net Cube using the Lars Petrus method. 25-09-07 20070927
80827.72 secondsAndrey Aleninn/a20050822
80827.72 secondsCarlo TripodiAfter a month of hard practice, today I did my first two times under 30sec and this is the best!20080127
81027.73 secondsAndrew ChoiMy average is around 37 seconds right now. This is the only nonlucky sub30 solve I've ever gotten.20071028
81127.74 secondsAndrew Webbern/a20070222
81227.87 secondsAntonino VilardiNot bad ;)Italian Rubik's cube group20061027
81327.89 secondsMarc Piche? 
81427.97 secondsEdward HouseThis was my second sub 30 solve.20080423
81528.00 secondsJesse PhamLol. My fastest solve ever! :D20080110
81628 secondsBen Leblondn/a 
81628 secondsChris FieldI average about 40 seconds. I've had a couple of really fast times, but 28 seconds is the fastest that I have timed. 
81628 secondsJan BalharNot a lucky (Lucky case 24 seconds). I have been practising two months. Only 25 algorithms! I 'll be the best cuber in Prague :-) 
81628 secondsJohn BoydDid in 1982 in the middle of the jungle in PNG.1982
81628 secondsJoel Waas Smithn/a20080430
81628 secondsLudwig FichteMy first non-lucky sub30 solve. I was so going crazy when I realized the time! so far my best solve has been 32 seconds.
Cross was about 5 moves, pretty easy F2L cases and my favorite OLL and PLL situation. sub20 here I come ;-)
20080627
81628 secondsZack LeeI've been working on some new algs and they payed off giving me my fastest time ever. This was not a lucky solve.20080806
82328.22 secondsKesavan Yogeswarann/a20070318
82428.24 secondsJustin MohrNot lucky but easy. Using modified Petrus method. The 2x2x3 block came together in about 10 moves 2 pairs of bad edges a T orientation alg to orient the corners and Arne for the PLL.20051024
82428.24 secondsRick Mazzantefun time with the cube that day!
petrus method
20060528
82628.29 secondsCollins Neweyn/a20060414
82728.33 secondsAndreas Bækdahln/a20080910
82828.38 secondsSiddarth SenthilkumarLucky solve Still learning F2L, OLL, and PLL. Skipped OLL, super easy PLL. F2L, 2 blocks already made. Super Lucky! :D 20080627
82928.40 secondsNathan WagenetWith layer-by-layer! Skipped only one step. I'm working on Fridrich now, but I just started that yesterday, and I'm already down to a best of 51 seconds. :)20050520
83028.4 secondsCollin PerschonI have days where I can go really fast and look ahead, then there are the days that I always pause between moves. 
83128.41 secondsAndrew RuestowMy first sub-30 time!!!20061219
83228.42 secondsCarl-Johan KjellanderFinally! A non lucky, sub-30 time! Done with the Petrus method practicing for Chalmers Open 2005. Chalmers Cube Club20050604
83328.48 secondsHao MinDid this during ad-break of Desperate Housewives.20050612
83428.51 secondsJan Gnoinskin/a20080519
83528.52 secondsIvan EnricoLucky! OLL skip. But this is my first sub-30, I always get 30.xx times :-(20070825
83628.57 secondsMichael GrimsleyNot lucky, but easy solve. 
83728.59 secondsForrest Rice4 months cubing with the petrus method20060601
83828.61 secondsLou CliftonFirst sub-30 solve, almost got a sub-40 average! 
83828.61 secondsHadley SheffieldDone during the Real-Man's Average of 10.
Not lucky per-say but after the cross one pair was already placed.
20080406
84028.62 secondsRed VendlSub-30 woot!
-CodeRed
20070312
84128.63 secondsFederico Marcellin/a20060802
84228.66 secondsJohn LwinThis was not lucky, just moved fast! cross was easy and fast pll and oll, need more learning :) must hit sub 20s. 
84328.70 secondsAndrew T DavisI swear that im not a nerd20060324
84428.71 secondsBryan ChengFinally a sub 30 =D20070701
84528.72 secondsBrion Jhames AndicoL2 U2 B' D F' L' U F L2 U B' U' B2 L D' L U D L' D2 U' B2 L' B' D'20080412
84628.75 secondsConrad MichelucciWith corners first methode, without luck.20051105
84728.86 secondsAndrew GrowdyMy first sub30 since I got back into cubing a few months ago20070703
84728.86 secondsJames WattBeen away a while, Learned a Few new Tricks 1st Sub 30 for me.
Jarhead Cubing
20071101
84928.92 secondsPyry LukkalaPetrus method, non-lucky.20080627
85028.93 secondsAili Asikainenn/a20070620
85128.95 secondsThomas RondNot a lucky case, I was just in the zone. 8-)
RubiXtremE - "It's on the edge."
 
85229 secondsNelson LeeA little bit lucky. 
85229 secondsBekim MahmutiSometime in mid 80's. This was my best time, and I have witnesses. Otherwise I used to solve it every time between 30 and 45 sec. 
85229 secondsDwayne DollardThis solve included an ELL. This alg was one I used to use when I first learned to solve the cube.20050416
85229 secondsZev EisenbergI use heavily modified verison of the method in the original manual. I replaced or optimized most off its algs. solve with a white cross on the bottom. I use partial F2L and fantisize about learing OLL/PLL. You can see me solve @ homepage.mac.com/igeek1/.20050425
85229 secondsMark KoenenI actually believe it was something in 28, but I'm not sure how much.20080317
85229 secondsSupakrit PaoliwatI Solve It At Scholl At Test Day 20080727
85829.02 secondsWonjun Choihttp://hs.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=439388&id=52671312320080224
85929.06 secondsKen NievaREM[Rapid Eye Movement], F2L, OLL, PLL, Ineed To improve And learn the other methods of solving the Rubik's Cube20081005
86029.08 secondsAlexandre NguyenMy only sub 30, I average 38 and I cant seem to squeeze 10 off. 
86129.11 secondsWilliam Polycarpen/a20051008
86129.11 secondsAvik DuttaThis is my fastest solve till date using fridrich 3-look LL.20061122
86329.18 secondsKyal ShepardI am planning to learn more algorithms, to increase my speed. 
86429.23 secondsRyan ProphetScramble: DB2R2DU'L2RB2D'R'D2F2B2L'FD2U'F'B2L'U'BD'LB'
My first ever sub-30!
20080815
86529.24 secondsJack Bartlettthis solve was completely on accident, but im happy with it20080501
86629.27 secondsSean WongI win you and I own20071112
86729.30 secondsJon Hoover"We choose to do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard!" 
86729.30 secondsAdam Slaten/a20030724
86929.31 secondsAdam AricoI did this before school started with my stop watch with 2 people watching and they both know..my freind scrambled it for like 5 minutes and it was a little lucky solve. I got to skip 3 of the 4 Algorithms.20070518
86929.31 secondsJames MolloyI'm learning the Fridrich method and I know 2 PLLs and about 7 OLLs. I just tried to see if I could solve sub 50 a couple of times when I get this really lucky solve. The cross took a lot of moves but I had created an extended cross from that without realising I had the 'T' OLL so I could just do F R U R' U' F' and then I had a U-Perm for the PLL which I find easy.20080304
87129.34 secondsPaul HlebowitshSub-30 for the first time! Woohoo!20060116
87229.35 secondsPatrick Haggertyn/a 
87329.37 secondsWelton Leungn/a20080712
87429.4 secondsPer JohnssonThis was a loong time ago in the early 80's. 
87529.41 secondsMiles Yuchtvery lucky for me
I'm just 14, and I have been solving for about a month now
easy sune oll
pll was h alg, I have been completing h in about 1.8 seconds
20070115
87629.42 secondsJay MoonMeh. Lucky-ish. Still using same old beginner's method hehe.. just some nimble fingers.20080111
87729.53 secondsThomas DehaezeC'est la première fois que je suis passé e-dssous des 30 secondes.20070324
87829.54 secondsNobil Kirma II16 second first two layers (no F2L or Keyhole used), easy cases for orientation of corners and edges, very fast permutation of corners and edges. Non-lucky. Done using the Bonde Timer (www.rubiks.dk) with computer scramble. 
87929.56 secondsCory LoviglioIt's weird because my previous best was 34 seconds, but this was just a lot of easy cases, not really lucky. I first starting cubing about a month and a half ago at EPGY and learned from Tyson Mao. I've set the bar pretty high for myself until my next best solve. (Done on the ultimate Rubik's cube timer). 
88029.62 secondsBenekire EmerkarIt is my best of best time. I look 3 hours. My rubik's cube in method of cubing and I solve. 56moves.20060609
88129.63 secondsBlake ByeB' D F U2 D2 F' U' F2 D2 F2 L2 F2 D2 B L2 R2 B' R' U' F' D2 F D2 F R
Super easy cross I picked F2L right and got a super easy last layer.
20080321
88229.78 secondsJustin TangMy times seems to be more consistent these days. So it's harder to get records even though my average times are so close to this solve. My computer 3x3x3 solve record is 24.02 seconds. I still need to improve on last layer though.20070718
88329.84 secondsAdam SherwoodThanks to AntiBenny I'm finally under 30. 
88429.85 secondsAsa KaplanWow this was crazy. i wasnt lucky and right after i greased my cube i got this record. also if any one finds a good diagramed rubik's cube speed soving solution emmail me plz.20070612
88529.87 secondsJon RogersSUB-30!!!!!!20070218
88529.87 secondsTom RaeAs close to lucky as possible without luck involved :) just easy cases for the F2L20080317
88729.91 secondsVince ZakisYeah. Fastest time so far but it's the first sub 30 i got.I really need help on the first two layers so if anybody could help me out.20070620
88829.94 secondsPeter DouthwrightFinally, I have broken the subb 30 barrier.20070312
88829.94 secondsTroy Manzittiwoohoo! first sub-30 even though i average at around 40-43 seconds20080104
89029.95 secondsJonathan RuelFirst non-lucky sub 30sec! Used timer at www.rubiks.dk/timer.html. 
89029.95 secondsMallet GregoryIt's my official best time, Set during French Champ 2004 . Corner first.20040416
89230.00 secondsKameron Ricksn/a20070820
89330 secondsPeter Yorkn/a 
89330 secondsJeremy KlasI like Corn Flakes. 
89330 secondsPablo DeLaLozaThis was a lucky. Average time 40 sec.1986
89330 secondsDarren LinI'm so proud!20070425
89330 secondsCameron Hesshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZDUTXQrQj420071116
89830.03 secondsManuel Petereynsi am doing it 3 month now i use layer by layer; last layer i first permute and then orient corners and then i use 2 alg which i can use 8 different ways to orient and permute edges20060215
89830.03 secondsAlex StewartThis is my fastest time, I;m gonna try a faster method to get it down to sub-20s. Video20070104
89830.03 secondsEvan Warnersmooth solve. not lucky. the middle edges paired up nicely with the first layer corners. everything went quickly from there20070304
90130.04 secondsFrida Riyanton/a20070403
90230.08 secondsFidel Rebullyes20080627
90330.23 secondsWesley Jarmonat this point i had been working on the cube for about 2 months and i finally got into the 40's with an occasional 31 or 32 lucky solve and when i was solving this one it felt like just another 40ish second solve but when i stopped the timer my jaw hit the floor, i thought it was going to be slow since it wasnt a lucky solve at all and it took a second for me to realize that i just solved an unlucky cube that fast :)20070418
90330.23 secondsKarl AfrikianIt was recess at my school. and i was solving around a 41 sec. average. my friend Nick and my history teacher Mr. Willis were both watching. Nick at the clock. Mr. Willis stating when i finished.and then i got a nice 30.23 on one of my solves..and before that..for 5 solves..i beat my record of 39 sec. for 5 solves in a row..and i had a 33 sec. and i beat it by 3 sec. on one of my solves.20080101
90530.26 secondsRyan WestI got this with a stopwatch during math class after a test.20070512
90630.28 secondsAdam Fischern/a20060120
90730.30 secondsDaniel WangR2 F D2 B L2 R D2 F' R U' B L2 B2 L R' F2 R U2 B2 F2 U' F' L R U
One of my fastest solves
20060927
90830.39 secondsJakub DanilewiczYeah!!!20071112
90930.46 secondsMatthew EarnshawPLL skip I think. Method: F2L + Beginners last layer20080224
91030.58 secondsDamien GuillotinSub-30's, here I come! No pro-cubing, they say it isn't a job, oh but I disagree you ignorant slob! www.bikskru.fr.st K10uB4L1F3! 
91130.60 secondsMathias BrownGot lucky because I didn't have to do the PLL.20080224
91130.60 secondsMatyas LagosBeginners (LBL) method, with rubik's 3x3. I want to go under 30.20080405
91330.62 secondsErik ListorI was timing myself when I was bored, and turned out to break my record!20070416
91430.71 secondsAlex Pattersonyeah, first page and close to .5 min, what else can i ask for?20060217
91530.73 secondsSam Kennedy3 move cross + 1 f2l pair, i finished the f2l in around 20 seconds, double sune OLL, T-Perm PLL. Best Solve Ever =D20071115
91630.76 secondsNiki FeldererCan't break the 30 second barrier.I got to work on the last layer I still solve it in 4 steps. 
91730.81 secondsJose Lorenzo AcuinSo close to breaking 30 secs. I still need to work on finger tricks and memorize more PLL algs. That's it! 
91830.86 secondsMatthew BarrettMy original record before this was 38.18. I had to put in every piece so it wasn't a lucky case. 
91930.87 secondsJacob WildesWith new speedcube bought at my first competition. Walmart cubes are really bad.20070328
92031 secondsSeb MercierUnder 30 s very soon (I hope) 
92031 secondsDaniel Jenglovelife*20051011
92031 secondsAaron Daubjust an easy LL with a partially completed Keyhole F2l.20080224
92331.01 secondsMichael Stegmeieraghh sooo close to breaking the half minute barrier, still goin for it
mike stegg-[reppin bohemia ny]
20070919
92431.02 secondsMarcin Rosadzinskin/a 
92531.05 secondsIsaac Walkupgot a slow method but fast hands. Time to learn fridrich method.20050720
92631.06 secondsKim HongulHere is my homepage
http://my.dreamwiz.com/pikajju0407
its not completely maded.
hello my name is Kim Hongul, 12years old.
ha;;; English is so hard
20070814
92731.09 secondsJoshua StarbirdI'm new at it (by a couple months) I don't know the whole fridrich method algorithms yet but 31.09 is when I got the oll and ppl's I knew )20080725
92831.19 secondsDavid Pooleim only 11 and ovesly im the fastest according to this web site.i was doing oll and after i was done it was solve.
SORRY FOR BERSTING YOUR GUY SES BUBBLE!!!
also practice is what got me this fast i practice 90% of the day
20080227
92931.25 secondsJustin Kaon/a20070503
93031.26 secondsEric Gouldn/a20060508
93031.26 secondsJunior TaittTotally unexpected! I can taste that sub-3020071116
93231.27 secondsKyle SpringmanThis was a fast solve, I got an easy cross, the F2L practically threw itself together, and one of my favorite permutations. 
93331.35 secondsCharles BlackThis was an amazing record for me! Timed with my friend's stopwatch on his watch.20080816
93431.36 secondsSebastian DumitrescuI think sub-31.36 is possible :D. Are there any Romanian cubers? I sure would like to meet one, since I'm a Romanian too :) My website. 
93431.36 secondsNeil KarpeI had a bunch of slow 40 plus times, and then got this solve. I was able to put to use my new F2L slot algs. :)20071112
93631.40 secondsGelo Gamboan/a20080331
93731.42 secondsKalvin LeeStill going, not using the Full Fridrich method, unfortuantely. Learning new algorithms soon..20070410
93831.46 secondsStephanie AligbeHaven't touched the cube since the start of the winter break but I picked it back up yesterday and that's what happened. //007!20080109
93931.5 secondsAndy BellenirStill too slow.but getting there. 
94031.51 secondsAlan ZhuLBL. done on stackmat. ALMOST lucky, but not. performed on my ultra-loose cube, that sucks a lot.but its ok20061106
94131.68 secondsJoe Shamahn/a20070415
94231.73 secondsDillon BeesleyConsiderably fast considering i don't know F2L and put corners then edges and i only use 3 look last layer. Only speed cubing for 3 months and i'm 16.20081005
94331.74 secondsJass MurutaluA lucky case. Set on 11.01.2006 with Jess Bondes web timer.
CHINKO.
20060203
94431.83 secondsChaz Strangen/a20050905
94531.86 secondsHwang-JongkyooLucky 
94631.87 secondsSteve CarterIt took a long time, but I finally did it. 
94731.92 secondsBen WilsonFirst timed session after a LOT of practice since the last one, was amazed to see this much improvement though.20080703
94831.94 secondsDoowon JooWell..It wasn't lucky because this case was the worst case I've ever seen. Because this case had the worst PLL and OLL (that I haven't used it before). Anyway it was faster than any other records.20060202
94932 secondsDon HarperI never could quite get under the 30 second barrier. I had around a 45 second average at the time I did this.
Visit my Rubik's Cube page.
 
94932 secondsBen ReichHooray! 
94932 secondsHyun-Jun JiSurely, it is not lucky time. Not only LBL solution but also speedcubing was used. 
94932 secondsJeff Changn/a20060801
94932 secondsLawrence XingI had just lubricated my cube and had a faster than usual solve finished with antisune + sune to skip the last step. 20061211
94932 secondsMax MaupinAWSOME!!! luckiest solve ive ever done. I just lubed my cube for the first time using clock gear oil and it was smooth as can be. The additional time was cut off due to skipping the pll.20070220
94932 secondsKyle Buddenyeh!!!!20070323
94932 secondsJustin WeiWas using a friend's cube for a competition because my cube has a habit of exploding into pieces. Started cubing and went into a blank mind-state and, before I knew it, a 32 second time popped up.20070403
94932 secondsTommy Hunteri had a really lucky last layer and a pretty fast F2L, I really need to get faster though.20070517
94932 secondsDanny Whiten/a20070814
94932 secondsEmerson Cabrera11 sec F2L with 21 sec last layer.
Done with all Dedmore method.
20080112
94932 secondsAlan WongIt's my fastest move at the moment. I will become faster!!!!20080508
96132.02 secondsAndrew Windon20080927
96232.30 secondsElliott BolzanAlmost sub-3520080917
96332.32 secondsOscar Roth AndersenYep. It was a fast solve (or it was a fast solve in my opinion) but it won't stand much longer -)20080817
96432.34 secondsScott LeslieI haven't posted my record in a while but I've gotten a lot better since last time :)20070522
96532.45 secondsNathan ViningThings just flowed. 
96532.45 secondsTim AndersonI did this about 3 or 4 months ago when I used to practice. I recently got into doing it again and I lost all my speed so I'll post this record for now20070925
96732.47 secondsJonas MagnussonF' D2 F L R B2 R L B' L U2 R' D2 F2 L U' L' F2 B2 R' U B2 U' R2 D2 All steps were encountered :)20070128
96832.48 secondsBen LuoLucky solve, with my own n00b-ishly slow beginner's method. Flipped LL edges, and it was done. 20060327
96932.50 secondsJeff De LeonI'm sixteen now, but during track season last year, I had the school record of 45 seconds. Now, I blew my own record away with a time of 32.50 seconds. Which, by the way, was timed by my Track Coach/World History Teacher the other day IN CLASS. We had a few extra minutes before we left, so he comes out with a stopwatch. And then to let everyone know the new record, he posted the time in big numbers on the chalkboard in the back of the room.20071210
97032.54 secondsLevi LinvilleMuch better than my last solves, but still needs work.20071125
97132.55 secondsMartin PlanèsUsing SLOW CUBING only !!! And without lucky cube !!!20050416
97232.64 secondsKyle BlissUsed Jessica's Method it was a lot easier than layer by layer. 
97332.75 secondsGlenn FordDid this one using a corner's first method modified extensively by yours truly. 
97432.85 secondsMac GinithanUsed Dan Knights advanced method, hard work is key for any speed cubist, every day I solve it at least 45 times working on my finger shortcuts and applying the algorithms without thinking about them. 
97532.93 secondsBartek KlimczakAfter 2 months with cube!20060626
97632.95 secondsSimon SörmanSub 30 soon!20080407
97732.97 secondsDennis BrenzelEasy F2L with 1 Look PLL20080208
97832.99 secondsDuy DangI was using the fridrich method and got a free pll. :)20070602
97933 secondsJason NewportI normally average around 45 seconds. This one just turned up easy (but not lucky!) 
97933 secondsBill BriereThis record was set in about 1982 using a Vaseline-lubed original Rubik's Cube. Average times were about 45 seconds, with a sub-40 about every 15th attempt. I had just begun working out shorter algorithms for the third layer, but only had a few really good ones, before discontinuing my work. So, my sub-40s were not lucky, but came only when I hit one of the new algorithms I was working on. Had I continued this work, I could have eventually completed any solution in an average of 35 seconds. Maybe I'll get around to finally finishing the project I started 20 years ago.1982
97933 secondsJoshua Alcantarareally good solve.20071113
97933 secondsAlex Badgerreally smooth run20071205
97933 secondsAntoine PiauI love rubik's cube20080104
98433.05 secondsRafael ChanD B D' L' U B2 D' L2 F' D B2 R2 U' D B R U B2 R B2 R' D L2 U' F .hehehe one of my best records20080519
98533.08 secondsBrandon J. VasosEvery improvement counts.20051208
98633.16 secondsMichael Deesen/a20071107
98733.21 secondsJan GeysenI achieved this record in the presency of all my friends.
It was a great moment for humanity!
20060407
98833.22 secondsEmmanuel Phua Sheng QiangI did this in singapore open.20080915
98933.33 secondsKoji Takahashin/a20070311
99033.44 secondsPeter SandorYeeeeeeeeeeahhhhhhhh..that's my best TIME..YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE20061025
99133.49 secondsStephen Chenlucky solve. ;]20070613
99233.50 secondsDoug Blackdone with fridrich method. it's been four months since i started. My best average is 50.2 so, as you can see, this was an incredibly lucky solve. 20060918
99333.53 secondsWen Haoa lucky solve.. i usually avg a 40s to 45s.. (:20080328
99433.60 secondsChristy Cockerhamn/a20050103
99533.63 secondsAlex DiTuroMy best solve. I usually average around 40 seconds20080326
99633.69 secondsTaylor HodgesThis was so lucky. I do a 4 look last layer, so after i "v"ed a "kite," i had it done. PB BABY!!!20080608
99733.79 secondsDavid Telitchkon/a 
99833.80 secondsJesse LeimgruberThis is my fastest solve yet! I am only 12 so I still have some time to get faster! I used the Friedrich Method for this solve. The video20071123
99933.87 secondsRyan Sanchezmore practice!!!!!20070614
100033.94 secondsRobbin KlerkxA bit lucky but I don't care.20080715