| Skewb (Average of 10) |
| Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.84 seconds | Hideki Niina | 10.71 6.84 6.16 7.90 8.63 9.80 (12.56) (5.91) 8.05 12.47 7.40 10.44 None of these times were lucky cases. | 20080302 |
| 2 | 9.95 seconds | Mike Tryczak | 10.03 (8.46) 8.82 10.82 (11.56) 10.68 10.10 8.48 9.51 9.39 11.54 10.09 => 9.946 I've been trying for a long time to get sub ten seconds, but I finally did it! With the help of a skewb solver I wrote, I was able to replace a few of my finishing patterns with much shorter ones. None of these times were lucky cases. | |
| 3 | 12.59 seconds | Jacob Rueth | 11.54 14.57 10.56 15.51 14.09 (16.42) 11.37 13.23 10.46 13.08 11.47 (9.73) I'm catching back up to | |
| 4 | 12.6 seconds | Stefan Pochmann | (9) 12 11 (15) 12 9 11 14 15 12 13 12 => 12.1 + 0.5 The 12s and 11s in the beginning were slightly lucky but what happened is expected to happen in 1 out of 9 cases and it doesn't save much. No other lucky cases (i.e. skipped steps) but I think more often than usual I had easier steps. | |
| 5 | 14.90 seconds | Tatsuya Ookubo | 12.08 (9.36) 21.43 15.65 12.10 14.13 10.66 15.17 20.94 13.66 (22.62) 13.16 | 20071218 |
| 6 | 16.06 seconds | Kĺre Krig | 13.96 16.26 11.42 23.78 19.06 15.32 15.49 19.55 (08.95) (25.10) 11.10 14.66 | 20050202 |
| 7 | 16.70 seconds | Casey Mihaloew | 14.18 16.48 17.54 18.54 18.9 15.76 (20.21) 15.82 (9.06) 16.37 The lucky one (9.06) i didn't skip any steps, but all steps were at their least possible position. | 20070127 |
| 8 | 17.50 seconds | Peter Babcock | It's 9:52 pm right now. now it's 9:53. | |
| 9 | 18.45 seconds | Shota Ihara | My site | 20080426 |
| 10 | 19.66 seconds | Mattias Berglund | 20.70 14.55 (10.43) 17.08 19.05 (29.32) 26.08 16.31 14.61 12.29 26.69 29.21 Made some mistakes. | |
| 11 | 21.65 seconds | Tobias Daneels | Very good average for me. I like this puzzles, but it hurts my wrists. | 20080206 |
| 12 | 23.02 seconds | Syoji Takamatsu | 9.28 22.66 25.25 24.61 (7.96) (66.96) 28.78 21.13 39.86 24.58 21.96 12.08 | 20080109 |
| 13 | 25.19 seconds | Olivér Nagy | my times: 15.26 29.54 14.36 28.93 (11.52) 28.22 29.18 30.6 27.64 (31.09) 23.98 24.14 there was two lucky: 14.36 and 11.52, but the others were non-lucky! I made some video during the solve, you can find them at my homepage: Rubikkocka.hu | 20060426 |
| 14 | 25.25 seconds | Yi Ren | n/a | 20090214 |
| 15 | 27.11 seconds | Chui-Hsien Lin | 18.488 30.486 18.338 20.401 31.167 [37.67} 32.298 36.825 30.936 (14.443) result 27.105 | 20080626 |
| 16 | 34.49 seconds | Joe Wallace | My skewb pops all the time. | 20060313 |
| 17 | 35.35 seconds | Yannick Martin | 37.75 29.23 58.71 32.28 25.31 41.46 23.54 (60.98) 33.18 36.51 35.48 (15.34) Sunday after noon, with beer and chips. My first and propably my last average of 10. | 20080407 |
| 18 | 35.57 seconds | Alex Kumaki | (52.22) 43.13 42.45 (14.41) 25.11 40.86 32.91 29.3 33.5 40.14 33.16 35.16 The 14.41 was extremely lucky | 20080116 |
| 19 | 40.18 seconds | Bob Burton | 31.37 33.34 33.78 41.98 36.21 34.43 (1:20.82) 59.95 41.59 31.62 (28.18) 57.51 Actually, I lie! It was a Valentine's Day present! :) Visit my site. | 20070511 |
| 20 | 52.65 seconds | Arthur Adams | 49.34 33.26 58.02 1:07.84 1:08.35 (17.96) 1:02.18 (2:16.77) 1:02.31 49.93 29.09 46.18 I haven't tried this puzzle in a while. My S.D. was 29.78. I should be more consistent. | 20070709 |
| 21 | 1 minute 15.76 seconds | Lucas Garron | 49.69 (2:40.59) 59.34 2:15.18 1:06.43 59.13 44.77 1:35.69 2:11.91 (42.10) 1:01.56 53.88 Not really an informative average; with all those 2's the standard deviation is 33 seconds. | 20060922 |