![]() | Rubik's Cube: Solving F2L (Average of 10) |
Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.27 seconds | Harris Chan | 06.44 05.90 (05.31) 06.38 06.03 06.78 05.58 06.17 06.79 06.33 (07.54) 06.32 RA of 13 solves. Pretty consistent eh? Japanese style inspect the first pair during the cross and make smooth transition to the first pair. Then I turn as fast as I can while maintaining no delay. I will learn multi-slotting. (I think I am using semi-multislotting that I do 2 pairs or more in one "motion") | 20071204 |
2 | 6.78 seconds | Stefan Huber | 6.09 6.25 (8.86) (5.63) 8.58 6.52 6.66 7.00 8.40 5.80 6.77 5.78 awesome! I don't wanna know what this would've been if I did normal speedsolves. | 20080909 |
3 | 6.83 seconds | Jason Baum | 06.74 05.83 07.64 (08.03) 07.73 07.06 06.66 07.48 06.53 05.95 06.67 (05.64) Fridrich F2L seems so much easier after practicing ZBF2L. I had a lot of good cases here, and several of these ended with just the basic 3 move inserts. Why can't I do this in competition. | 20071201 |
4 | 6.95 seconds | Jean Pons | 6.53 6.58 6.13 7.36 7.77 6.42 7.55 (10.88) 6.22 7.33 (4.80) 7.63 Not a RA the 4.8 was incredible !! | 20071112 |
5 | 7.20 seconds | Hiroyuki Take | 06.81 06.83 (09.48) 07.24 06.97 08.61 06.95 06.94 07.31 (06.70) 07.25 07.06 my weblog | 20071117 |
6 | 7.52 seconds | Adam Polkowski | 06.89 06.54 06.62 08.57 07.67 07.17 08.30 10.18 07.46 07.73 06.86 07.92 It's ok for me but I see posibility to be faster still. | 20071230 |
7 | 7.56 seconds | Thibaut Jacquinot | 7.39 7.30 7.41 7.97 7.93 7.49 7.31 (9.77) 7.60 POP 7.64 (6.58) 7.53 | 20070122 |
8 | 7.80 seconds | Piotr Kózka | 8.02 (6.23) 7.69 7.72 8.11 (8.58) 7.67 6.75 8.47 7.97 8.45 7.16 | 20080909 |
9 | 7.87 seconds | Erik Akkersdijk | (6.70) 7.05 (10.66) 7.69 7.98 8.81 8.28 7.53 6.92 8.08 8.55 7.80 | 20071019 |
10 | 7.88 seconds | Jason Thong | 7.75 8.65 7.85 8.46 8.87 7.03 8.34 (10.07) 8.15 (5.61) 7.20 6.54 (SD=1.17) WTF!! Before this I never thought a non-lucky sub 6 run was possible, I was just that focused! One of the 7.xx runs had a F2L pair already solved. I'm starting to question what is considered too lucky. I can start on any color, so 4 move crosses are not that uncommon. I love exploiting easy cases, it makes the first F2L pair so much easier to track! My global average is somewhere in the 9s, but for 12 runs, color neutrality gives me a high variance so it's possible to do much better than the global average. Go figure, this was a RA that went very bad after the 6.54. I want to see how fast Yu Jeong-Min can do this. I also recently updated my site | 20070109 |
11 | 7.89 seconds | Phillip Espinoza | (06.69) 6.86 8.42 (08.64) 8.14 6.91 7.52 8.45 8.05 8.25 8.56 7.73 I really need to work on my F2L | 20080607 |
12 | 8.29 seconds | Phil Thomas | 7.06 8.77 9.22 (6.33) 8.30 7.86 8.69 8.81 (9.81) 8.50 7.88 7.81 | 20080917 |
13 | 8.46 seconds | Quinn Lewis | (9.66) 8.10 9.51 8.72 9.49 7.66 (6.35) 8.79 8.53 8.57 8.80 6.39 Zero cube rotation really helps with the speed of the F2L. Couple this with identifying the cross+ first pair all in the preinspection makes especially fast F2L. | 20060101 |
13 | 8.46 seconds | Gunnar Krig | 07.96 09.02 08.65 08.75 07.40 08.72 (10.03) 08.25 07.78 08.05 10.02 (07.15) | 20080307 |
15 | 8.57 seconds | Brent Morgan | 8.62 6.84 8.43 8.23 (10.32) 8.6 8.37 9.66 9.07 9.33 (6.48) 8.54 Almost a second faster than my previous record for this. Interesting. I think this can be beaten- seeing all the pieces is indeed the key. Visit my site! | 20060224 |
16 | 8.76 seconds | Brian Nicole Uy | Philippine Cubers Association | 20080301 |
17 | 8.84 seconds | Marc van Beest | (07.36) 09.82 (10.33) 07.44 09.31 10.09 08.57 09.84 08.42 08.21 08.12 08.59 Ra of 26 solves. The first avg was around 9-10 sec so I now know that I need to practise F2L again. | 20071219 |
18 | 8.85 seconds | Mitsuki Gunji | (6.53) 9.78 9.89 9.34 8.79 7.03 9.72 8.46 9.45 8.51 (10.76) 7.52 | 20061128 |
19 | 8.89 seconds | Sébastien Felix | 9.38 8.59 (10.21) 8.04 (7.58) 10.05 8.95 8.68 8.23 9.30 8.12 9.49 Simply a multislotter. Done in legal conditions hands on table. I see sub8 in this category.[Absolut teaM member] | 20050726 |
20 | 9.56 seconds | Joël van Noort | 7.40 10.81 (12.06) 9.38 8.57 9.96 9.82 12.03 8.07 10.29 (6.75) 9.31 My first try at this, after hearing about this new category. I guess I can get sub9 with this.. My website is www.solvethecube.co.uk. | 20050806 |
21 | 9.75 seconds | Chris Hardwick | 11.50 8.86 9.69 10.18 10.78 (7.20) 9.41 (12.68) 11.20 7.94 9.62 8.36 Thank you combination opposite color and Xcross solving for making sub-10 F2L possible for us regular humans. ;-) | 20051204 |
22 | 9.77 seconds | Olivier Gaucher | 08.96 08.92 12.41 09.70 (08.28) (12.51) 09.32 10.16 08.59 09.94 09.78 09.93 I hope I will be soon sub-9. [Absolut Team Member] | 20050825 |
23 | 10.25 seconds | Jon Morris | 10.58 (12.02) 11.56 10.22 10.09 8.98 10.84 11.11 9.67 9.02 10.44 7.74 I can do better. | 20050726 |
24 | 10.54 seconds | Pedro Santos | 10.48 09.67 09.34 11.42 09.98 09.72 11.22 11.06 (08.95) 11.66 (13.45) 10.89. My firs try at this.I don't know if that's my real F2L time.if so my LL is about 5 seconds. | 20070624 |
25 | 10.80 seconds | Thomas Watiotienne | To be sub 10 in this category seams to be so impossible. | 20070628 |
26 | 10.81 seconds | Anthony Benis | 09.78 12.71 09.65 10.99 (13.66) (09.48) 10.30 10.12 10.12 10.78 11.52 12.09 A very consistant F2L average for me the times look about right considering my LL isn't super fast yet. | 20071020 |
27 | 10.92 seconds | Teemu Tiinanen | (08.27) 08.98 12.09 11.00 11.07 10.67 11.64 (13.11) 12.55 10.07 10.09 11.05 This is a RA of about 60 solves. Normally I average about 12-13 seconds so this is quite good for me. Soon sub-10 ;) | 20070513 |
28 | 10.99 seconds | Andy Tsao | 09.06 12.98 (13.84) 10.02 09.77 (08.73) 11.36 11.30 11.75 11.75 11.48 10.42 | 20060813 |
29 | 11.01 seconds | Mat Moitinho de Almeida | 10.69 9.73 12.00 (15.63) 12.27 10.48 10.63 10.91 (9.69) 11.69 11.50 10.20 My last layer sucks. | 20050902 |
30 | 11.21 seconds | Toby Mao | 10.63 (09.07) (13.29) 10.40 11.40 10.88 10.89 13.17 11.51 11.48 10.96 10.75 | 20050724 |
31 | 11.30 seconds | Per Kristen Fredlund | 13.02 11.81 (17.00) (9.44) 10.27 9.69 10.02 10.42 10.94 13.42 12.86 10.56 Umm . im not sure why my best and worst time tend to be next to eachother :-O I tried this category for fun. Now i see clearly where i lose most of my time. I really though my f2l was a few secs slower than this. Or maybe doing only f2l made me go faster somehow? Not sure . I will practice this more :-) | 20050728 |
32 | 11.32 seconds | Bernett Orlando | 13.58 10.88 (13.92) 10.99 12.78 8.72 10.96 8.24 (8.23) 13.76 10.24 13.06. I will continue to practice until I get sub 9 sec. | 20060220 |
33 | 11.36 seconds | Jai Gambhir | 09.03 10.49 10.30 11.78 10.43 (15.44) 10.46 12.27 (08.93) 14.09 12.09 12.64 [SD=01.48] I could probably get a better avg if I did a RA but this was just a little diagnostic avg to see whether I needed to work on my F2L or my LL. Seems it's neither; I need to work on my consistency >_> | 20080224 |
34 | 11.57 seconds | Ou Chen | (15.36) 10.50 10.39 12.20 (09.25) 10.99 12.96 14.08 10.87 11.59 10.26 11.85 | 20080705 |
35 | 11.70 seconds | Bordas Szabolcz | n/a | 20081026 |
36 | 11.80 seconds | Peck Ern-Min | n/a | 20081231 |
37 | 12.25 seconds | Ronald Herbert Dunphy | n/a | 20070413 |
38 | 12.80 seconds | Michael Fung | 13.74 12.79 14.26 11.82 11.66 12.78 13.24 12.26 11.54 18.09 13.90 10.88 Timed with 'The ultimate Rubik's cube® timer version 2.1' | 20051209 |
39 | 12.81 seconds | Kåre Krig | 13.28, 12.64, 12.99, 11.61, 12.56, 13.92, 12.53, (15.50), 11.24, (11.18), 13.71, 13.65 | 20061110 |
40 | 13.43 seconds | Stefan Pochmann | 12.94 13.63 (21.85) 15.33 (11.47) 12.77 11.68 13.19 14.23 13.96 11.49 15.11 Best rolling average in an average-of-50 of 15.21 seconds. | 20050901 |
41 | 13.68 seconds | Jefferson James | I just wanted to try this again. | 20071231 |
41 | 13.68 seconds | Ciro Alessio Formisano | 12.05 12.38 (11.56) (16.05) 15.56 12.33 14.41 14.16 14.12 14.74 12.55 14.52 | 20080702 |
43 | 14.00 seconds | Justin Tang | 13.47 (12.52) (18.66) 15.09 12.88 14.47 16.41 12.75 12.78 13.84 14.03 14.25 This is actually pretty good for me.. But my LL is really slow (still need to improve).. So I'm pretty happy with this average. | 20070719 |
44 | 14.28 seconds | Bob Burton | 12.87 11.05 (19.64) 13.28 15.10 14.40 13.68 15.55 18.80 (10.91) 13.21 14.84 My real average is about 15. Visit my site. | 20060603 |
45 | 14.30 seconds | Pablo Ruiz Campos | 15.44 (11.25) 14.67 14.84 (15.45) 14.88 15.00 13.53 11.10 14.81 14.74 13.88 Mexico. | 20050925 |
46 | 14.74 seconds | Justin Adsuara | 13.94 15.45 13.61 13.78 14.17 16.64 16.51 (16.95) 13.86 (12.84) 13.47 15.98 My previous average was 18.30. My new DIY rocks! | 20070701 |
47 | 14.93 seconds | Anthony Hsu | (18.18) 14.23 14.88 13.79 (13.46) 14.99 14.94 16.26 15.54 14.17 16.48 14.01 I use Petrus F2L and Fridrich LL. I'm very rusty. This was the first time I've ever timed only F2L. Good practice. I need to work on F2L and maybe switch to full Fridrich. | 20050730 |
48 | 16.43 seconds | Carlos Antolin Lucas | n/a | 20080925 |
49 | 16.72 seconds | Takuma Shirahase | 15.46 16.86 22.14 (11.58) 15.93 14.78 (28.12) 15.7 11.89 17.73 19.27 20.02 My site | 20070405 |
50 | 17.41 seconds | Davide Macri | no good | 20081219 |
51 | 18.83 seconds | Andrea Santambrogio | n/a | 20081029 |
52 | 18.94 seconds | François Dellacherie | 20.43 15.02 14.88 21.80 (14.74) 14.94 (26.19) 21.80 22.65 18.19 19.16 20.62 Ridiculously high SD (3.04). Still freezing on some configurations. Sub25 on the whole cube will be possible once I can produce this 15'' F2L consistantly. I'll only solve F2Ls in August. | 20050731 |
53 | 20.15 seconds | Sunghwan Mun | 18.30 22.32 20.53 17.85 19.83 19.29 22.21 21.32 17.82 21.99 | 20061215 |
54 | 22.03 seconds | Jason Goss | I'll get better. | 20070808 |
55 | 22.46 seconds | Isaac Firesmith | very lucky since i only know 4 f2l algorithms | 20070220 |
56 | 23.63 seconds | Nicholas Leung | n/a | 20080402 |
57 | 23.82 seconds | Ryan Jew | I used LBL. I tried mzny times and i ended up with this time. | 20080417 |
58 | 27.66 seconds | Eirik Strøm | Why do I always end up on the bottom of the list? | 20080118 |
59 | 27.84 seconds | Adam Quintana | 25.78 33.68 30.34 23.10 32.86 20.89 28.21 28.18 30.89 24.48 | 20080410 |