Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
1 | 5.17 seconds | Kyle Allaire | I did 55 moves to mix it up and then looked at it for 3 seconds and saw they were almost in pairs but mixed up amongst eachther well and it took about 25-30 moves to solve. sub 5 is possible. | |
2 | 7.93 seconds | Joe Bedford | I have been practicing a LLLOOONNNGGG time each day for a while. I will post a video for my next record. | 20090201 |
3 | 8 seconds | Michael Cramer | I finally did it in under 10 seconds! Im 14 and Ive had the record here for a long time with 11 seconds. I need more competition. | |
4 | 9.40 seconds | David Alatorre López | After 2 years, I broke my previous record! | 20080926 |
5 | 9.68 seconds | Quinn Osgood | finally got sub-10 | 20060501 |
6 | 9.80 seconds | Kegham Khosdeghian | I just started, literally, 1 hour and 45 minutes ago. This puzzle is really easy, no algorithms needed, just a lot of common sense. (brain teasers help a lot) | 20070301 |
7 | 9.98 seconds | Drew J. Smith | n/a | 20080723 |
8 | 10.99 seconds | Giuseppe Spina | Put .99. I didn't remember the exact time | 20090214 |
9 | 14.31 seconds | Nathan Woundy | I can't believe I beat the next guy by .02 seconds! Don't worry, it wasn't just a luck setup, I actually can do them under twenty seconds, most every time. | 20090201 |
10 | 14.33 seconds | Emile Compion | First sub-15 solve. Timed it on the cube timer my friend programmed (Scott's Magical Cube Timer), which is unfortunately unavailable to the public at the moment. Caught it on video too! | 20060830 |
11 | 14.42 seconds | Tori Bertschy | n/a | 20090201 |
12 | 16.90 seconds | Wuqiong Fan | got a best lucky of 6 seconds. I played with this for the past 2 days because I don't have my cube at the moment. | 20080207 |
13 | 17 seconds | Kendall Quan | I am obsessed with this puzzle. I'm 14 and I can't put it down | 20090201 |
14 | 18.46 seconds | Andrew Minucos | Hoping to get under the teens soon | 20090201 |
15 | 18.61 seconds | Daniel Hayes | There are three possible positions of the last row after the rest of this puzzle is solved, this time I had the best one (already solved) this puzzle is young in the cubing community though, and this time probably won't be very good for very long ;) | |
16 | 18.92 seconds | Dylan Frye | PWNT!!11! Not really but it was pretty awesome. | 20080508 |
17 | 19.70 seconds | Robert Schlicht | Git it yesterday. My method is a little slow (1-4, 5-8, 9 and 13, last 5 pieces) but it's good for lucky cases. On to blindsolving it next! | 20080802 |
18 | 20 seconds | Andrew Smith | wow, i can't believe i can solve the 15 puzzle in 20 seconds! most of the people in my school are amazed that i could do it in around 30 seconds average but wow 20 seconds. | 20070405 |
19 | 20.29 seconds | Jake Beddoe | I'm working for under 20.00 | 20090214 |
20 | 23 seconds | Will Klausler | fast | 20090507 |
21 | 23.25 seconds | Aaron Hind | 23.25seconds 35 moves to mix it up | 20080121 |
22 | 23.44 seconds | Jordan Veillette | It takes time to be able to complete it fast, so keep practicing! | 20081231 |
23 | 23.8 seconds | Drew Quist | n/a | 20060227 |
24 | 25.09 seconds | Niko Kauffman | I've solved it before, but just got the puzzle yesterday. Simple and fun. I'll definitely practice this. | 20080710 |
25 | 25.13 seconds | Dennis Fyksen | Yes! I have finally gotten a faster time than 32 seconds. (took me a while) | 20071208 |
26 | 25.31 seconds | Jon Rogers | Sooooo easy. | 20061122 |
27 | 27 seconds | Adrian Li | I got this time since I started learning this puzzle only one week ago. I plan to be even faster. | |
28 | 28.17 seconds | Ryan Sefcovic | I'm catching up Quinn! | 20060812 |
29 | 30.54 seconds | Ryan Brown | never give up | 20081121 |
30 | 34.6 seconds | Sam Maurer-Hollaender | n/a | 20080111 |
31 | 37 seconds | Grant Slatton | Just got it a few hours ago, been in my pocket most of that time. Not even 10 solves yet, quite simple. | 20080429 |
32 | 38.24 seconds | Michael Atkinson | This is that little square with fifteen tiles, and you slide them around to get them in order. I like to call it a 2 dimensional Rubiks Cube. I could do better. | |