Rubik's Magic: One-handed

Place	Result	Name	Quote	Date
1	1.97 seconds	Patrick Jameson	haha yeah! Finally broke the 2 second barrier! :D	20081206
2	2.01 seconds	Ming Gao	2.01 seconds!! Practise practise. And then break world record!^_^	20090308
3	2.06 seconds	Milán Baticz	Sub-2 in progress. Practise, practise, practise. :)	20070313
4	2.22 seconds	Derrick Eide	Watch out Patrick! :)	20081231
5	2.27 seconds	Michael Gottlieb	It's still possible to go faster.	20070111
6	2.33 seconds	Jonathan Mun	Achieved while at the Rubik's World Championship 2005, but never posted. Video of my slower 2.49 second solve.	20060712
7	2.34 seconds	Roy Mok	1. 2.34 2. 2.68 3. 2.36 4. 2.65 5. 2.44 avg:2.49 single &avg PB http://dragoncube.org/forum/viewthread.php?tid=2201&extra=page%3D4	20090510
8	2.35 seconds	Johannes Laire	Best average is 2.76.	20060424
9	2.78 seconds	Erik Johansson	Just did this a few times for fun.	20070810
10	2.79 seconds	Kenneth Gustavsson	Part of my best average of 3.68. Times was: 3.08 2.85 3.13 (DNF) (2.79) 3.12 3.06 5.03 6.62 3.46 3.31 3.15	20070128
11	2.89 seconds	Matthew McConaha	I've been practicing this quite a bit. Maybe I should get some practice for official events :) Used a method that I made up.	20081021
12	2.97 seconds	Bob Burton	I really believe sub-2 seconds is possible on a perfect execution, though I am very far away. I can average under 4 like this, though.	20050828
13	3.19 seconds	Frederick Choo	video is found here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK1fdZ5OcZk	20081116
14	3.76 seconds	Alexei Gousev	Using my own method, one that closely resembles my normal speed-solve method. The first transform only works on a soft surface, so I did this on my bed. Timed using a Stackmat.	20061122
15	4.61 seconds	Linus Langsmo	wooohoo	20051225
16	4.95 seconds	Stefan Pochmann	On a stackmat. I got 5.68 quite early but then it took a looong time to beat 5 seconds. I probably did around 100 attempts or so.	20040505
17	5.51 seconds	Andrew Roley	Done on a hard surface, so no cheating like some guys. My magic was already quite loose from 20 mins. of practicing, so when I almost broke it I decided to quit.	20070403
18	6.54 seconds	Jon Morris	I think 5.5-6 seconds is possible.	20040514
19	6.92 seconds	Daniel Borrajo Gutiérrez	Not as difficult as I thought, I was just practising	20080422
20	7.50 seconds	David Skolnik	I really dont get how you can do it in 2 seconds!! I use the booklet way to do it one handed because it seems impossible to speedsolve it.any suggestions?	20060118
21	9.14 seconds	Michael Atkinson	Not nearly as hard as I expected it to be. I can probably get this time down to five or six seconds, eventually. Hey, that rhymed.