Rubik's Clock

Place	Result	Name	Quote	Date
1	5.16 seconds	Koen Wermer	n/a	20090308
2	6.26 seconds	Edwin de Menezes	I had solved it in 14 secs in 1991 and 12.66 secs in 1996 and now its 6.26 secs.	20080801
3	6.56 seconds	Mátyás Kuti	Not lucky, just easy case. Check out the video	20070108
4	6.66 seconds	Jacco Krijnen	Done in the car with Mats to the Dutch Open 2008. 666 Number of the Beast hehe =P. Koen deserves the official WR!	20081021
5	6.84 seconds	Matthew Rudnicki	Really awesome solve. I got two lucky clocks, but overall was just a really fast solve. Turning was fast and super accurate. I'm really pumped right now.	20080516
6	6.87 seconds	David Woner	WCA style scramble: u=5 d=0 / u=-4 d=1 / u=2 d=2 / u=-1 d=-1 / u=-3 / u=6 / u=4 / u=3 / u=-1 / d=0 / UUdd	20090214
7	6.91 seconds	Derrick Eide	Wow! Wow! I didn't expect this time for me! sub 7 yah! :)	20061027
8	7.52 seconds	Szabolcs Balázsi	n/a	20090201
9	7.53 seconds	David Pemberton	2 clocks skipped, my order exploits easy faces so I get lucky often.woot!	20071112
10	7.55 seconds	Shota Kobayashi	Good!	20080818
11	7.56 seconds	Taki Sugimoto	n/a	20080708
12	7.97 seconds	Sander Hendrickx	I think around 8 seconds is more or less the limit. skipping 1 (or maybe 2) steps isn't considered lucky because it happens quite a lot with the clock (and trying to exploit lucky cases gives you bad bad times :-s) Cheers Stefan :-) My method	20060108
13	8.05 seconds	Stefan Lidström	best solve of new 9.81 10(12) average PB	20081231
14	8.14 seconds	Stefan Pochmann	I wish I could do this all the time. I'm not even safe below 10 but most solves are below 11 now.	20040805
15	8.35 seconds	Stijn van Gils	my first non-lucky sub-9. and a pretty fast one thanks to Sander, using his method	20051206
16	8.55 seconds	Gunnar Krig	It was very fluid, but I think I can do low-7 with a perfect solve.	20050609
17	8.61 seconds	David Woner	only one skipped step. it was just extremely smooth. this was the first scramble from the #34 contest on speedsolving. also the first solve from this video	20080826
18	8.74 seconds	Erik Akkersdijk	From my 10.53 avg. A realy good solve.	20061011
19	8.98 seconds	Dan Gosbee	17 years after i bought my first one, I can still hit under 10 seconds everytime!!. A really good feeling.
20	9.85 seconds	Cameron Yeoh	Once you know how to do it, it is really easy. Practice makes you quicker!
21	9.87 seconds	Boris Konrad	There it is! Sub10! YES :) SpeedStacks Timer, lubed Clock, Stefans system (thanks!)	20060305
22	10.00 seconds	Andrea Santambrogio	n/a	20081016
23	10.31 seconds	Joseph Liao	Rubik's Clock is addicting! Thanks to Stefan's site, don't forget to visit mine ) My site.
24	10.61 seconds	Dan Cohen	Very easy.	20080304
25	10.64 seconds	Wim Lambrechts	close to sub-10 now	20060622
26	10.81 seconds	Bob Burton	There is still room for improvement. Visit my site.	20060602
27	10.82 seconds	Garmon Roberts	Second time breaking my record in a week.	20090106
28	10.98 seconds	Fumiki Koseki	next sub 10.	20061217
29	11.23 seconds	Thomas Bischof	I know I've had at least one sub-10, but I of course forgot to record it. Had this puzzle for a few weeks now.	20040814
30	11.67 seconds	Ben Picolo	That brings me to top 10, eh :)	20051021
31	11.93 seconds	Lucas Garron	Got fast today. Completely non-lucky solve, just very smooth.	20071112
32	11.99 seconds	Anssi Vanhala	n/a	20060417
33	12 seconds	Jasmine Lee	I was really excited when this puzzle came out, but I quickly realised that in no way could it live up to The Cube. It's definitely much easier than it looks. Having said this, I couldn't do 12 secs now, I set this time ages ago when the puzzle first came out. Haven't touched a Clock in years.
34	12.22 seconds	Hadley Sheffield	Hope to have times like this at nationals!	20080508
35	12.33 seconds	Pedro Campos	I had this bet with a friend he told me I couldn't do it below 13s his rubik's clock. Did it :) I don't think I'll practice to get a faster solve (perhaps BF it some day), I also have a sub30 cube solve bet going on )
36	13.12 seconds	Thom Barlow	I'm aiming for sub-10 here. Doesn't look that far off, either.	20050908
37	13.56 seconds	Tobias Daneels	Thanks to stijn for teaching me.	20051201
38	13.63 seconds	Péter Trombitás	yeah sub 15! prctise practise and get faster:D	20081109
39	13.73 seconds	Craig Bouchard	When I get into this mode, all my puzzles just start getting good times, and I break a lot of PBs.	20051121
40	14.37 seconds	Thomas Le Roux	My first sub-15.	20060927
41	14.63 seconds	Michael Gottlieb	Not lucky, but this is fast for me.	20070205
42	14.80 seconds	Gilles van den Peereboom	n/a	20050905
43	14.90 seconds	Charlie Cooper	i need a smooth turning clock!	20071112
44	15.15 seconds	Joe Wallace	I'm pretty pleased with this.	20060313
45	15.76 seconds	Ben Whitmore	First sub 20.	20081102
46	16.06 seconds	Tim Sun	Best non-lucky solve of my best average.	20060526
47	16.08 seconds	Tristan Wright	Very satisfied with this time, hope to soon get under 15 seconds.	20060512
48	16.59 seconds	Emanuele Scibilia	Not a good result, I know. But I have a lot to improve. I have to practice more. :P The Italian Rubik's cube group	20071201
49	17.44 seconds	Kelley Reynolds	n/a
50	18.02 seconds	Ben Luo	Still getting used to Stefan Pochmann's method.	20060418
51	19.97 seconds	Sean Connolly	A pretty good solve. By no means lucky, but I was able to set 3 clocks on the cross with my opening move. My clock turns nice & smoothly, and by the way, Dan Harris, YOU'RE NOT HAVING MY CLOCK! -) Oh maybe if you want to borrow it on DCD'05 but I must have it back!! Who is 'Absolute' and who is 'Obsolete' anyway? Me, I'm just plain confused! -)	20051013
52	20.00 seconds	Zebadiah W. Ziegenbein	I got this puzzle just this weekend in the mail, i bought it off ebay for 2.99 and it came with the box and instructions. And it was only a state away!! This was pretty good since i have only had it like 3 days. And when i opened it with in 5 minutes of opening it, it was sovled. Now i just have to do a lot of practice on looking ahead at the other clocks and having a faster mind for this puzzle. And it moves pretty good too.	20060424
53	27 seconds	Rune Zedeler	Cannot go any faster than this. :-( Still thinks it pretty fast, though. Far too easy for a Rubik's puzzle.
54	27.01 seconds	Dan Harris	I want Sean Connolly's Clock. Cubestation.co.uk. [Obsolete Team member with Stefan]	20050718
55	30.54 seconds	Thomas Clement	Bleh, getting better. Not quickly though.	20060525
56	31.65 seconds	Ouyang Yunqi	n/a	20080531
57	32.32 seconds	Ton Dennenbroek	Just tried 5 times
58	35.57 seconds	Mikael Vanhala	n/a	20060417
59	46.08 seconds	Josh Rotholz	Not bad for my 10th ever solve ) I love this puzzle.	20080503
60	47 seconds	Jeroen Hörters	easy puzzle	20071015
61	55.32 seconds	David Chung	Played using the 1 in Rubik's website, since I don't own a Rubik's Clock.	20090510
62	2 minutes 36.74 seconds	Patrick Jameson	i beat my record by like a minute.	20070217
63	2 minutes 53 seconds	James Watt	Just got it in the Mail today awesome little puzzle. I will keep at it and get faster I hope. Jarhead Cubing	20060316
64	4 minutes	Jason Grochmal	Best I can do with my technique.