Square-1 (Average of 10)

Place	Result	Name	Quote	Date
1	14.65 seconds	Kazuhito Iimura	15.48 (17.78) 17.17 16.08 (11.91) 15.51 12.68 13.96 14.75 12.84 14.55 13.47 Good!	20080928
2	19.22 seconds	Andrew Nelson	16.53 27.78 21.53 14.66 21.65 20.27 16.50 18.40 21.69 14.13 19.91 21.13 <+micro501&rt Eidolon's Average: 19.22 Best Time: 14.13 Worst Time: 27.78 <%Eidolon&rt IN YO FACE SEAMUS	20081003
3	19.23 seconds	Seamus Sullivan	this was great abg i only had a couple sub 20s and only 1 sub 15	20080903
4	20.13 seconds	Grzegorz Prusak	[18.50 16.75 22.68 21.52 (24.53) 20.59 21.91 15.65 20.00 23.52 (15.52) 20.15] one of 15.xx was LC	20080511
5	20.51 seconds	Martin Zahradník	21.63 16.63 22.38 (35.38) 26.63 (15.80) 18.50 23.47 18.66 19.69 19.33 18.19 Yeees!! I'm very happy with this average, only one horrible solve. It isn't rolling average. First twelve solves today. :-)	20080227
6	22.55 seconds	Gavin Nelson	Great Average! 2 sub 20's and I think 5-6 of them had parity	20080729
7	24.43 seconds	Michael Fung	22.94 28.13 27.07 (20.00) 27.06 21.90 20.01 (33.30) 25.30 20.24 27.63 24.06 Timed with 'The ultimate Rubik's cube® timer version 2.1'. I did this one day before the Belgian Open 2006. I think I had about two or three extremely easy edge permutations. But two days earlier I had also a 25.49 avg (I think this avg hadn't extremely many very easy EP's, although I am not very sure). I decided not to post this avg yet, because I didn't want to motivate Lars extra voor the Belgian Open :p. Unfortunately I couldn't handle with the pressure during the Belgian Open :( (also because it was 'mean of 3', so I couldn't permit any mistakes or bad solves). For the square-1 I (should) know all the 99 EP's and I also know for every shape a solution with the minimum amount of twists.	20060506
8	24.87 seconds	Lars Vandenbergh	24.64 20.03 (17.34) (31.95) 28.25 27.31 27.58 27.85 22.18 23.03 27.06 20.78	20070808
9	27.21 seconds	Michal Robaczyk	(19.43) 31.27 22.36 29.97 27.55 30.66 28.68 31.31 21.56 23.97 (47.25) 24.77	20070713
10	27.72 seconds	Bernett Orlando	27.70 31.08 (43.38) 26.06 (18.27) 37.91 32.02 23.72 20.13 30.09 21.84 = 27.72 sec I am delighted. All the solves are 40 moves scrambling algm from Mr.Jaap site.	20071001
11	27.77 seconds	Dan Cohen	(21.81) 26.5 23.34 28.77 24.75 (44.78) 28.53 24.38 27.11 28.83 31.31 34.21 Just loosened my sq-1 a little. Had a couple of parity solves in there but got pretty lucky with those.	20080607
12	28.55 seconds	Milán Baticz	Solves without parity: 23.73, 20.28, (19.82), 25.58, 22.68, 27.28, 24.71. Solves with parity: 32.30, 34.37, 41.79, 47.37, 32.79. My parity algs are very slow. I use only 4 algs for the edges at the end of the solve. Practice, practise, practise.	20070529
13	28.56 seconds	Choi Go-Ho	23.36 24.55 28.53 24.08 32.08 31.05 28.50 38.86 28.48 26.08 (17.05) (40.33)	20070802
14	29.87 seconds	Erik Akkersdijk	(20.80) 29.88 35.86 27.42 24.55 28.98 33.67 (39.30) 34.08 28.06 32.97 23.24 Woooo sub-30! Thanks to Lars!	20080930
15	30.91 seconds	Ben King	(9.28) 36.19 28.07 31.52 35.42 27.19 26.25 31.86 (40.43) 39.11 27.08 26.36 The scramble for the 9.28: 0,6/0,3/-5,3/5,5/-2,3/-3,3/0,3/6,3/-3,3/6,3/3,3/6,0/6,3/6,3/0,3/ It WAS completely random! KamscRcc	20060626
16	35.25 seconds	Jason Baum	28.00 39.58 34.91 35.28 37.64 (25.52) (44.47) 28.66 39.41 37.67 36.78 34.61 I started practicing this again. I need to learn more algs.	20080523
17	35.47 seconds	Trevor Davila	26.94 31.94 43.61 36.28 30.98 29.52 44.00 38.45 41.78 (46.92) 31.17 (26.00) Cubestation YouTube	20070809
18	37.73 seconds	Evan Ralston	n/a	20080519
19	39.33 seconds	Derrick Eide	32.25 44.70 (1:02.84) 33.35 49.02 35.94 31.54 43.86 47.24 31.37 (30.03) 44.01 YAY!	20080423
20	39.86 seconds	Joël Heymbeeck	47.31 (22.69) 38.58 43.25 38.75 43.32 41.38 33.38 (47.73) 32.89 I can't believe it. I haven't touched my square-1 since Dutch Open and decide, 3 days before Belgian Open, to train a little bit. After a few solves, I take this average. Personal best average and personal best non-lucky solve :D 22.69 was not lucky (just too easy, 4 moves for square form and easy algo for each steps), 33.38 was lucky and I had a pop during EP of the 47.73	20070222
21	43.91 seconds	Syoji Takamatsu	46.79 48.96 40.77 49.40 33.78 40.03 (76.89) (31.28) 46.85 48.21 50.12 34.18 I spent much time on an training this week. My site	20060817
22	44.73 seconds	Edouard Chambon	Done 2 months before the WC 2005. I wanted to beat Lars in the WC but i realize that it was very hard. I gave up to continue the cube 3x3x3. I've just one thing to say : Congratulations Lars !!	20051110
23	46.96 seconds	Pedro Santos	(37.99) 48.84 45.92 (1:05.20) 50.14 39.19 38.08 50.59 43.60 54.69 46.57 51.40. Wow! Just wow! This is more than 7 seconds better than my last one! :o Video of the 37.99 at my youtube channel -> http://www.youtube.com/user/PedroSG	20080208
24	47.10 seconds	Marc van Beest	42.16 53.78 31.69 (29.14) 45.52 36.03 1:01.05 (1:11.25) 36.02 1:00.61 47.27 56.91 SD=10.69 Very nice avg. Done after 21 days of squaring. The 31.69 and the 29.14 were lucky: no CP. The other sub 40's had easy shapes. With the 1:11.25 I messed up the shape during the solve, so I had to start all over again.	20061229
25	48.11 seconds	Michael Gottlieb	54.38 (28.94) 42.79 47.47 42.32 46.72 33.44 49.33 50.62 54.91 59.13 (1:09.33) This is ridiculous for me best mean of 3 before it was 51. The 28 was very lucky.	20081002
26	50.77 seconds	Emile Compion	53.56 45.08 1:02.25 39.75 52.76 48.34 (1:09.73) 52.72 57.31 (36.20) 45.50 50.47 Some very fast times for me :)	20080331
27	55.26 seconds	Ouyang Yunqi	n/a	20080515
28	55.80 seconds	Tatsuya Ookubo	49.93 54.70 66.62 (39.56) 50.89 57.84 55.65 49.34 41.66 (67.90) 64.06 67.34	20060930
29	58.78 seconds	Tim Reynolds	50.81 1:01.49 1:00.04 (28.93) 57.72 1:11.02 1:03.26 59.04 (1:46.44) 54.08 49.27 1:00.91 The 1:46 it took me a minute to get to cube shape, and I'm really not sure why--usually it takes me about 10-15 seconds. The 28 is non-lucky. It's only January 5th and my first 2007 goal is complete, which is a sub-1 average. Woo!	20070106
30	1 minute 1.39 seconds	Suteerapon Hung	n/a	20080408
31	1 minute 7.40 seconds	Brian Nicole Uy	Too busy to cube now as in I cube only once a week. Philippine Cubers Association	20080827
32	1 minute 9.16 seconds	Emerson Herrmann	only been doing square-1 for a week, hope to do good at my next competition!	20080802
33	1 minute 11.1 seconds	Mike Godfrey	58 74 72 63 (90) 61 69 76 84 (53) 77 72 => 70.6 + 0.5
34	1 minute 23.37 seconds	Doug Li	1:04.29 2:01.84 1:15.27 0:56.40 (2:06.43) 2:02.53 0:46.01 2:02.79 0:57.46 (0:44.87) 1:44.65 1:02.44	20070209
35	1 minute 33.56 seconds	Arthur Adams	1:36.46 1:20.56 1:36.40 1:46.42 1:57.82 1:13.05 (54.11) 1:12.11 (3:19.79) 1:37.00 1:34.10 1:41.72 Preparation for EPGY I suppose.	20080207
36	1 minute 40.1 seconds	Ron van Bruchem	95 102 (122) 91 (85) 102 91 97 95 111 102 110 => 99.6 + 0.5 I use a simple system with 3 sequences.
37	1 minute 42.32 seconds	Yeom Seok Hoon	1:58.36 (2:12.47) 1:51.44 1:19.42 1:51.11 2:08.25 1:28.70 (1:09.09) 1:11.84 2:05.45 1:29.19 1:39.46 I'm Korean cubist. No lucky.	20040611
38	1 minute 54.31 seconds	Bob Burton	1:56.19 1:51.46 (1:20.89) 1:57.22 2:10.73 2:00.90 1:31.45 (2:17.24) 1:35.11 1:41.22 2:09.70 2:09.17 I can do better now. Visit my site.	20060608
39	2 minutes 2.40 seconds	Mike Tryczak	Like Chris I have developed my own method as I have for every puzzle I own. Not a bad solution if I do say so myself. {1:50,1:46,2:02,1:50,2:26,(2:46),2:15,2:18,2:01,1:59,(1:29),1:52}=2:01.9+.5=2:02.40
40	2 minutes 8.8 seconds	Katsuyuki Konishi	{ 2:08,1:39,1: 32,1:42, (0:31), (4:49), 2:46,2:43,4: 01,2:18,0:59,1: 32} = 2 minutes 08 seconds +0.5
41	2 minutes 26.17 seconds	Chris Hardwick	1:47.82 (1:45.44) 2:34.08 3:02.13 2:19.86 (3:03.50) 2:35.68 2:07.27 2:38.20 2:18.79 2:58.00 1:59.89 I don't have an efficient way of fixing the parity error when it comes up, so I need to work on that. I still don't see how you guys get so fast!