Pyraminx (Average of 10)
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
14.48 secondsGrzegorz Luczyna3.60 5.90 5.43 5.20 3.89 3.58 5.01 4.34 4.96 2.86
Part of 5.49 mean-100
POLAND!
20070902
25.17 secondsTomasz Kiedrowicz04.20 06.09 05.16 (08.59) 04.12 05.06 06.18 05.98 04.50 (03.38) 06.66 03.77.
Poland!
20071209
35.82 secondsKamil Górski4.22 6.08 (11.90) 4.96 (3.01) 7.74 3.78 5.86 4.93 8.13 6.91 5.54
a part of mean1000: 7:60
POLAND :)
20080116
45.88 secondsMátyás KutiYeah, better than Piotr's! :)20070112
56.15 secondsPiotr Kózka(3.98) 6.99 7.96 4.84 7.37 6.56 4.71 5.74 6.45 (8.64) 5.38 5.49
Old record. I don't practice pyraminx.
20070903
66.32 secondsRon van BruchemWith my new yellow Pyraminx from cube4you.com.20080512
77.20 secondsDerrick Eide06.17 8.91 6.78 6.62 6.15 (04.50) 6.18 8.20 (13.84) 10.22 7.45 5.34
Part of 8.97 mean of 100
Canada! XD
20080702
87.51 secondsErik Akkersdijk8.36 6.77 8.91 8.05 6.44 8.36 4.33 (9.11) 7.61 8.13 8.11 (3.50) Pyraminx: cube4you (white one plus homemade stickers) Lucks: both sub-5 times. Pyraminx is fun! -D Method: centres of 1 layer edges of 1 layer LL (1 alg of course) tips20080531
97.90 secondsSiraj AliAfter I got a 7.83 average on Cubemania I did an average of 12. I plan to be the first sub-8 North American in competition!20080626
108.55 secondsSyoji Takamatsu9.22 9.11 9.72 10.51 (4.85) 8.32 7.45 9.40 9.73 (16.62) 5.84 6.24
My site
20060624
118.67 secondsTrevor DavilaGeez. Really good solves. Only 2 super-10's.
Fastest Time: 04.86
Slowest Time: 11.14
Standard Deviation: 01.31
YouTube
Cube Station
20070831
129.09 secondsDan Cohen7.72 8.16 9.72 7.43 (13.53) 8.06 7.16 12.71 (6.94) 13.43 7.38 9.1620080512
139.47 secondsSeongho ParkWell..My Cube is still lonely.
It is the first time to break sub 10.. in my case..
My blog..
20070529
149.50 secondsTobias Daneels10.67 06.95 08.86 11.20 08.70 09.69 (05.33) 08.77 07.39 11.41 (12.75) 11.31
SD: 1.62
20071119
159.62 secondsJoshua Li09.30 (07.30) 08.41 09.84 09.81 10.39 (13.80) 11.42 09.25 10.92 09.09 07.80
it took me two days to get this time..surprising this puzzle is easier to pick up than i thought..but.how the helldo people get down to times sub 7 average??
20071215
169.95 secondsArthur Adams(07.98) 09.61 08.50 08.31 11.47 09.50 09.58 09.84 (14.03) 11.56 10.97 10.14
Wow. sub-10. I wasn't expecting so many fast solves in there. Practicing for CalTech Summer. I have been waiting for an American Pyraminx event. ;)
20070820
179.96 secondsAndy Bellenir9.02 8.75 8.91 10.36 (13.31) 11.80 8.53 11.42 10.22 11.81 8.74 (8.35)
YES!!! Less than 10 seconds :)
 
1811.15 secondsKĺre Krig10.74 11.44 10.70 11.80 08.28 (07.66) (23.58) 14.72 10.89 11.86 09.30 11.7820050809
1911.24 secondsDavid Antivilo9.84 11.99 9.62 12.55 13.01 12.54 12.10 9.40 9.16 (14.28) (8.91) 12.17 
2011.3 secondsShotaro Makisumi11 16 12 6 (3) 11 7 11 12 9 (28) 13 => 10.8 + 0.5 = 11.320031001
2111.65 secondsSam Cappleman-LynesIts amazing what a better look-ahead and pre-inspection can do to your time.
11.23, 12.07, (8.04), 10.98, 12.32, (17.89), 13.45, 9.85, 10.54, 12.76, 12.47, 10.83
The 17.89 was an edge put in flipped and I had to change it, mucking up my solution.
20061204
2212.30 secondsTim Reynolds12.30 11.19 12.88 12.30 (05.33) 13.83 11.75 (23.34) 09.71 11.25 15.94 11.86
My best average the day I lubricated my new pyraminx. I got the same time twice which was the same time as the average! The 5.33 was lucky I think it was a 7-move solution with only one tip twisted.
20071216
2312.51 secondsRon Herbert DunphyBest average of ten out of a 14.66 100 average. Included in the average of 100 are solves of 3.05, 4.49, and 5.38. The 3.05 was solved in 11 moves and was lucky, considering I average 20 moves per solve. 20070413
2412.59 secondsOtto von Hellens9.95 9.48 12.27 15 90 9.79 12.65 13.67 (9.29) 19.71 10.48 (19.82) 12.02. I'm developing a new method.20080305
2513.08 secondsKenneth Gustavsson11.69 14.54 (18.65) (6.67) 16.11 14.12 12.28 14.70 9.81 15.63 11.69 10.21
Was lucky in 6.67 (skiped a lot) and 10.21 but not in 9.81 = my second non lucky sub 10 =)
20071201
2614 secondsWuqiong FanAll sub 20! and a record of 9, then 8, then 7 seconds! All solves were rounded to closest second and the average turned out to be 13.xx, so I rounded it up.20071207
2714.31 secondsJack Moseley13.44 18.52 12.56 15.40 11.81 19.63 12.33 15.53 (20.83) (9.47) 10.61 13.30
Sub 15! I just got my pyraminx yesterday. There were a few lucky solves in there.
20071220
2814.72 secondsFumiki Koseki(10.21) 13.18 (18.62) 15.89 14.65 11.48 14.18 16.49 14.09 17.79 13.62 15.8120060701
2915.04 secondsJim HerronI got my pyraminx less then a week ago.20051008
3015.47 secondsToshihiro Oonon/a20070114
3115.57 secondsJoseph Liao14.03 17.82 (7.54) 14.67 (23.21) 20.78 12.75 13.99 17.43 16.75 15.51 12.00
starting to love the pyraminx more and more, I only use 2 algorithms for the whole thing, hopefully I can make up more to become faster.
 
3215.62 secondsJohan HillerströmForgot to save the average but the times were all below 20s, fastest was 9,60s (luck)20070106
3315.96 secondsJoël Heymbeeck11.83 22.34 (23.02) 13.95 16.22 12.37 14.19 (8.72) 15.10 22.16
I should train a little bit before taking an average :p
20060713
3416.20 secondsChris Almich18.44 20.36 (21.08) 15.63 16.58 10.19 (8.91) 21.58 12.80 19.20 18.27 11.39
Yeah, I did great here. I set my personal best of 8.91 in this average. Still improving!!
20050704
3516.86 secondsTatsuya Ookubo16.70 13.76 19.78 (10.60) (22.56) 14.44 15.07 20.29 14.60 19.81 18.43 15.7620060618
3617.12 secondsPrzemek Kolowski20.12 13.31 22.46 11.58 18.04 (11.56) 20.66 16.68 14.12 12.83 (25.31) 21.35
I used a stopper made in Delphi by me ;) My link
 
3717.50 secondsMike TryczakOnce again using my own method. Appearantly not the most efficient method in the world. This is an average of ten trials as described elsewhere on this page. Those times are {20,16,15,14,18,(25),(13),16,18,16,17,20}=17.0+.5=17.5  
3820.5 secondsTomasz PiotrowskiThanks to Przemek for method and Pyraminx (I don't have my own). 
3921.94 secondsCraig Bouchard28.56, 17.01, 17.96, 22.28, 17.52, 28.00, 24.04, 13.14, 20.82, (13.07), (30.46), 30.05
Emile was saying to me how he had a faster pyraminx average and I was like, I never practice it, so I made myself a workable pyraminx by taking the edges of my anniversary one and mixing it with my axel of the 1980 one.and then I did this :D Have fun Emile
20061126
4022.07 secondsBernett OrlandoI saw this puzzle just 3 days before Dutch Open-2006 where Ron uncle taught me this for few min. I never touched it since then till today. Now, I like to give it a try for few days.20070430
4123.74 secondsOuyang Yunqin/a20080531
4225.86 secondsEmile Compion27.19 25.92 20.59 28.31 26.65 26.04 (14.15)(33.06)25.45 30.18 27.83 20.48
Not bad for only a week of practice. I use my own method. I'll hopefully be able to get a sub-20 average once I get a better pyraminx.
20061030
4327.33 secondsJoe WallaceI will get faster when I know some more algs20060313
4428.95 secondsBob Burton(21.89) 26.96 29.75 29.69 23.94 37.14 32.04 23.57 (44.62) 31.78 23.52 31.16
Done using my zero-algorithm method.
20050127