Rubik's Cube: Executing all 21 PLL algorithms (Average of 10)
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
132.89 secondsBreandan Vallance:D very consistent. most were low 32s/high 31s. only two werent sub 33. One was a pop(which rarely happens with my cube :P) and the other was just bad. video of some 32.xx solves: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcNDcQoycRY20090308
236.28 secondsHiroyuki Take36.12 (38.72) 36.38 36.26 36.09 35.94 37.30 37.06 (35.02) 35.19 35.69 36.81
35.02video my website
20071208
337.61 secondsMilan BaticzPractise, practise, practise...20090308
443.79 secondsRyosuke Higon/a20070430
544.79 secondsJohannes Laire44.30 45.19 (41.11) 45.53 44.31 44.28 (46.13) 44.91 45.61 45.53 43.34 44.8920070106
646.51 secondsYuji Yoon45.34 45.30 47.84 (48.86) 45.53 47.18 47.28 46.58 46.00 46.86 (44.56) 47.27
My Weblog - Amazing Speed
20071228
747.18 secondsMichael Gottlieb50.29 46.66 45.60 46.24 47.32 (51.11) 47.24 47.53 43.82 48.35 (43.57) 48.78
I don't know how but it looks like I can turn fast now. The 46.66 45.60 43.82 and 43.57 were all PBs.
20090214
847.93 secondsOlivier Gaucher(51.94) 47.42 (45.22) 47.36 46.31 47.73 49.76 51.17 48.11 48.25 45.70 47.48
It's not the end. Simply Absolut Team Member.
20050728
949.90 secondsKatsuyuki Konishi48.40 48.26 50.42 52.50 (47.14) (53.39) 50.56 49.22 50.21 52.79 48.14 48.50
Is it enough? SoIt was possible by even averaged. PLANET PUZZLE
20050506
1053.13 secondsTatsuya Ookubo53.08 52.44 (51.16) 53.35 53.84 53.49 54.86 51.55 53.28 53.94 (55.69) 51.4220070313
111 minute 13.61 secondsGabriel Nez(1:07.14) 1:14.56 1:13.72 1:14.99 1:15.15 (1:15.31) 1:13.02 1:11.81 1:15.26 1:10.65 1:13.7120071023
121 minute 15.74 secondsChristophe Thiriot1:16.78 1:11.72 1:17.77 1:14.24 (1:11.31) (1:21.16) 1:12.05 1:14.44 1:18.08 1:18.66 1:15.31 1:18.33.
I'll be back with new pptimized algs!!
20050608