| Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
| 1 | 1 minute 43.06 seconds | Brad Davis | I don't think I can get much faster because the puzzle gets stuck alot. Not the best for speedsolving. Plus it hurts my hand after awhile but still fun. | 20080320 |
| 2 | 1 minute 46.03 seconds | Chris Gilsdorf | The time was actually a little faster than this, but Steve Arnold didn't know how to use the timer. | |
| 3 | 2 minutes 7.27 seconds | Jhonny Ruiz | made two mistakes solving the top part, I should have broken two minutes already, I will keep trying :) | 20080415 |
| 4 | 2 minutes 11 seconds | Shotaro Makisumi | I invented my own method, but it kind of stinks (orientation and permutation for LL, but in a weird way). | |
| 5 | 2 minutes 20.44 seconds | Michael Gottlieb | I'm using a Megaminx-like method. I need to memorize the color scheme better! | 20070219 |
| 6 | 2 minutes 43.08 seconds | Zebadiah W. Ziegenbein | This was a nice solve. I just kept going as fast as i could. My puzzle is finally starting to break in. I love the Impossiball but it is now Possiball. | 20060515 |
| 7 | 3 minutes 52 seconds | Gunnar Krig | First time I solved it. Same method as megaminx. | |
| 8 | 4 minutes 45 seconds | François Reitter | The first time I solved it ! with "meffert's method".I think when someone will find algorithms or formula like those actually existing for the 3x3x3, we'll could solve it in an average between 1:30 and 1:45 (I'm working on it all my nights. :-) | 20050711 |
| 9 | 4 minutes 55 seconds | Brian Odom | Getting better at it. I can think faster than I can grip it, so I need to come up with better ways of gripping and twisting the puzzle. And of course, better algorithms. | 20070423 |
| 10 | 5 minutes 36 seconds | Ryan Thompson | second good solve, not lucky at all. Ive only known how to solve it since a week ago. | 20060126 |