Rubik's Cube: Scrambling with a computer generated 25 move scramble
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
15.95 secondsJohannes LaireThis helps.20071031
26.05 secondsJason BaumR' U R2 U R L' B2 U' R2 F' U F B U' D' L2 D' U R' B2 R D' B D L
I wanted a sub 6 but this is good enough.
20070510
36.42 secondsPatrick Jamesonit took me like 30 times to get this score.20070217
46.47 secondsHarris ChanTimed with a stackmat. It didn't feel all that fast I guess I can probably beat it.
The scramble: U L' U2 F' R' F2 U' B' F' D2 L' B F D2 R D' U B F D L B2 F' D U2
20080318
56.78 secondsErik AkkersdijkIt is more fun to do 5 scrambles in a row.20070405
66.82 secondsStefan HuberBest try out of my average of 12 which was 8.90. The scramble was U R F U R' B R F U' F2 R B' R' U D2 F2 R2 U' D2 B' R' U F' R U'.20080127
77.16 secondsPhil Thomasfirst time using Jason's scramble20080423
87.20 secondsCharles HuynhIt took a few tries. I was trying to finger trick some of the turns and as a result, my first few tries had pops.20080626
97.31 secondsMilán BaticzU B' F' D' R U L' U L' D' U B D F2 U F' R' F L2 B' R U2 R' F D'.
Practise practise practise.
20080710
107.91 secondsMichal RobaczykYeah20061218
118.32 secondsAndy Thichme best record20070924
128.69 secondsMichael AtkinsonUsing Jess Bonde's Ultimate Rubiks Cube Timer, I just start the timer and perform the random scrambling algorithm there. I know I'll be able to break 8 seconds, at least..probably even better than that though.20050610
128.69 secondsHiroyuki Taken/a20070212
148.78 secondsThomas WatiotienneNot very interesting20070721
159.39 secondsCraig BouchardBah.this is harder than it seems.17th PB for the day.20060316
169.49 secondsBob BurtonI only tried this a couple times and was waiting for a sub-10. Visit my site.20060518
179.80 secondsIsaac Firesmiththis is a wierd catagory20070222
1810.47 secondsJosh Bergyay first time trying20080424
1911.71 secondsAaron McGhieThis was about my 3rd try. I did like 8 attempts but then I noticed that every attempt was nearly the exact same time so I quit.20070709
2011.88 secondsArthur AdamsNeed a better cube for this. I tried it!20061218
2113.77 secondsAlfred Ferwerdan/a20070821
2213.91 secondsAnthony BenisWell, I was never very good at scrambling.20070215
2314.53 secondsJohn ShephardI have never really tried this until I saw this category. This is a result of my second attempt at this.20070623
2415.13 secondsNicholas NeckJust For Fun20071015
2515.51 secondsTyler YarnelliKinda easy20080430
2615.53 secondsLucas GarronI'm still way too slow. Arthur should try this.20061016
2716.12 secondsRyan JewI used Jnetcube. I tried quite a few times and i finally got a pretty good time Scramble: R2 L F2 U' F D F' B D' B F R2 F R D R U2 D2 F2 R' F' U2 R U2 R'20080415
2816.75 secondsAndrew Roleywhere f(x)= (x^2+1)/2, If x is 11 (prime), f(x) is prime, as well as f(f(x))), f(f(f(f(x)))), f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x))))))), and possibly f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(f(x))))))))))). The number of times the function is used is 1,2,4,7,11, respectively. The number of composites between each of these primes is 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Unfortunately, It would take hundreds of computer years to see if this pattern went any longer.20070405
2917.89 secondsJacob WildesThis is stupid. maybe it's because I'm very slow.20070127