Rubik's Magic: One-handed

Place	Result	Name	Quote	Date
1	2.06 seconds	Milán Baticz	Sub-2 in progress. Practise, practise, practise. :)	20070313
2	2.27 seconds	Michael Gottlieb	It's still possible to go faster.	20070111
3	2.33 seconds	Jonathan Mun	Achieved while at the Rubik's World Championship 2005, but never posted. Video of my slower 2.49 second solve.	20060712
4	2.35 seconds	Johannes Laire	Best average is 2.76.	20060424
5	2.59 seconds	Derrick Eide	Sub 2.50 is in reach.	20080410
6	2.78 seconds	Erik Johansson	Just did this a few times for fun.	20070810
7	2.79 seconds	Kenneth Gustavsson	Part of my best average of 3.68. Times was: 3.08 2.85 3.13 (DNF) (2.79) 3.12 3.06 5.03 6.62 3.46 3.31 3.15	20070128
8	2.97 seconds	Bob Burton	I really believe sub-2 seconds is possible on a perfect execution, though I am very far away. I can average under 4 like this, though.	20050828
9	3.76 seconds	Alexei Gousev	Using my own method, one that closely resembles my normal speed-solve method. The first transform only works on a soft surface, so I did this on my bed. Timed using a Stackmat.	20061122
10	4.61 seconds	Linus Langsmo	wooohoo	20051225
11	4.95 seconds	Stefan Pochmann	On a stackmat. I got 5.68 quite early but then it took a looong time to beat 5 seconds. I probably did around 100 attempts or so.	20040505
12	5.51 seconds	Andrew Roley	Done on a hard surface, so no cheating like some guys. My magic was already quite loose from 20 mins. of practicing, so when I almost broke it I decided to quit.	20070403
13	6.54 seconds	Jon Morris	I think 5.5-6 seconds is possible.	20040514
14	6.92 seconds	Daniel Borrajo Gutiérrez	Not as difficult as I thought, I was just practising	20080422
15	7.50 seconds	David Skolnik	I really dont get how you can do it in 2 seconds!! I use the booklet way to do it one handed because it seems impossible to speedsolve it.any suggestions?	20060118
16	9.14 seconds	Michael Atkinson	Not nearly as hard as I expected it to be. I can probably get this time down to five or six seconds, eventually. Hey, that rhymed.