Rubik's Cube: Assembling into solved state
PlaceResultNameQuoteDate
112.82 secondsDavid Woneryay sub 13! i actually set the UWR at 14.12 but broke it 10-12 more times because i wanted a sub-13. i use a unique method of my own design. the video of the solve and a guide is here. only my second day doing this. and ron im sorry for posting the same event 2 days in a row.20080731
214.20 secondsStefan PochmannWhen I start the 21 pieces are of course "lined" up properly but they do not touch each other (they even don't when I insert them, i.e. I don't press together two pieces and insert them at once even though I think this could be faster) and I don't hold anything in my hands. Don't do this with your best speedcube ;-) 
318.41 secondsDerrick EideDamn you stefan..20070424
419.01 secondsCharles BouchartAfter seeing Stefan Pochmann's video, I tried it too ! It's really fun ! I combined stefan's method, with "F2L" method ! but, whithout "F2L", I also did 22.54sec ! just tried it like 5 times ! Stefan is really fast !!! My site 
521.38 secondsTon DennenbroekI made some mistakes, so I could go a bit faster. I just got home after the WC2003 and I could not get to sleep. 
623.13 secondsMason Hoffmann/a20070314
725.26 secondsFrank MorrisI was bored, so I figured I would try to better my record. It took maybe 10 tries. 
827.31 secondsOlivér NagyI can do it better! to put in the first two is the most difficult to me, the others are easy.20060226
929.17 secondsErik Johnsonvery easy. I got this on my 5th try or so.20060712
1029.48 secondsAndrew RoleyI'm not sure if I'm doing it ilegally, but none of the pieces are touching when I put them in. 14 seconds is crazy!20070530
1129.58 secondsJeffrey ZhangYay sub-30! Stupid edges20071228
1231.53 secondsMichael SwanI can't believe I'm 10th in for a dexterity record.20070720
1332 secondsChris HardwickLike Stefan I start with the pieces "lined" up and I do not place multiple pieces at a time. After seeing Stefan's time I was inspired to give this a shot. I did this in the library while studying with some friends. I think I can break 30 seconds with practice, though I don't know how dedicated to this category I will be in the future. 
1432.29 secondsJake HaslemannI was bored during math class, so I destroyed my cube and rebuilt it without the teacher noticing.20070510
1533.30 secondsTyler WilkinsonAlot of Fun. Lined up all pieces in corresponding groups of three. None were touching of course.20070401
1634 secondsJim Herronn/a20050821
1734.07 secondsBob BurtonI've only tried this a couple times. Visit my site.20060601
1836.77 secondsHadley SheffieldGot this time on my 3rd attempt at it. Lined them up to do it.
Kinda fun but not something I will do on a regular basis.
20080224
1937.70 secondsRyan Mah2 at a time. 
2037.76 secondsBordage BertrandIt was the first time I did it, so I can do more better.20040620
2137.96 secondsAaron ZhaoThis is hard.20070529
2239.13 secondsGarrett DickersonFirst try, so I can probably do better.20061215
2343.74 secondsDamien GuillotinYeah! Who's da man?! Cool site 
2446 secondsAlex PowellThere is room for improvement in this, but I think my system is very efficient. A looser cube would work better also. 
2546.45 secondsDan Sealmy first time. stacked F2L, lined up the rest20060116
2646.7 secondsHeath LittonI'm wondering how Ton got 26 seconds !!!! lol 
2746.80 secondsRichard PattersonI use the F2L method for assembly too. 
2854.24 secondsRyan JewI put it together the way i solve it: layer by layer. (corners first on last layer.)20080414
2956 secondsJoseph LiaoI am not a cheater, lol. 
3057.49 secondsGrant TregayI had tried this before, but this time I lined the pieces up on my desk first (instead of leaving them in a heap), and that took almost a minute off my time. I could see taking off another 5-10 seconds this way, but that's about it. 
3157.95 secondsGreg BrownThat was my first time. It was easy too.20071015
3258.36 secondsPeter BabcockI just had to try it. Maybe I'll get better, who knows. 
3359.95 secondsAlex Pattersonwoohoo i beat i minute.20051112
341 minute 0.34 secondsDavid Gugl2nd try^^20071231
351 minute 1 secondColin SchnackerCould probably make sub minute but im lazy.20070306
361 minute 3.96 secondsThomas ClementFirst try. So-so. Will try to better it.20060219
371 minute 4.14 secondsBradley Davisn/a20070506
381 minute 5 secondsWuqiong Fanso silly, first time.20071231
391 minute 8.95 secondsRay WangWell this time I lined up all the pieces and put them in cool-looking positions.
Rainbows!
So then I got about 1:15 off my time (I think)
20071021
401 minute 10 secondsNate Sloatn/a20070918
411 minute 26.52 secondsRamis WadoodFirst try. Could do better20080206
421 minute 50.45 secondsBlake BakerMe and my friend had a battle.. I won. He's a noob20070503
431 minute 53.60 secondsMatt Glanfieldawsome. flipped a couple of pieces though20070416
441 minute 54 secondsWill SteeleThis is my third timed try.
when i saw there was a record for i i though i gotta try
20070509
451 minute 59 secondsJacob WildesArggh. Dropped the last piece. Took ten secs to find it. Still not good. Oh well. This is not a record I really care about.20061221
462 minutes 33.23 secondsTyler YarnelliIt's kinda hard20080430
473 minutes 6.70 secondsAsa KaplanBEAT THAT MICHAEL lol i was using my cube and all of a sudden i got a phone call which is annoying. im that 11 year old btw if you are wondering 20070611
483 minutes 10 secondsMichael GruenI just bought one off of rubiks.com and took it apart for lubing. (will sand it down later). I thought it might be fun to time myself reassembling it, hence "solving" it.