![]() | Rubik's Clock |
| Place | Result | Name | Quote | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.26 seconds | Edwin de Menezes | I had solved it in 14 secs in 1991 and 12.66 secs in 1996 and now its 6.26 secs. | 20080801 |
| 2 | 6.56 seconds | Mátyás Kuti | Not lucky, just easy case. Check out the video | 20070108 |
| 3 | 6.84 seconds | Matthew Rudnicki | Really awesome solve. I got two lucky clocks, but overall was just a really fast solve. Turning was fast and super accurate. I'm really pumped right now. | 20080516 |
| 4 | 6.91 seconds | Derrick Eide | Wow! Wow! I didn't expect this time for me! sub 7 yah! :) | 20061027 |
| 5 | 7.53 seconds | David Pemberton | 2 clocks skipped, my order exploits easy faces so I get lucky often.woot! | 20071112 |
| 6 | 7.55 seconds | Shota Kobayashi | Good! | 20080818 |
| 7 | 7.56 seconds | Taki Sugimoto | n/a | 20080708 |
| 8 | 7.97 seconds | Sander Hendrickx | I think around 8 seconds is more or less the limit. skipping 1 (or maybe 2) steps isn't considered lucky because it happens quite a lot with the clock (and trying to exploit lucky cases gives you bad bad times :-s) Cheers Stefan :-) My method | 20060108 |
| 9 | 8.14 seconds | Stefan Pochmann | I wish I could do this all the time. I'm not even safe below 10 but most solves are below 11 now. | 20040805 |
| 10 | 8.35 seconds | Stijn van Gils | my first non-lucky sub-9. and a pretty fast one thanks to Sander, using his method | 20051206 |
| 11 | 8.55 seconds | Gunnar Krig | It was very fluid, but I think I can do low-7 with a perfect solve. | 20050609 |
| 12 | 8.61 seconds | David Woner | only one skipped step. it was just extremely smooth. this was the first scramble from the #34 contest on speedsolving. also the first solve from this video | 20080826 |
| 13 | 8.74 seconds | Erik Akkersdijk | From my 10.53 avg. A realy good solve. | 20061011 |
| 14 | 8.98 seconds | Dan Gosbee | 17 years after i bought my first one, I can still hit under 10 seconds everytime!!!. A really good feeling. | |
| 15 | 9.85 seconds | Cameron Yeoh | Once you know how to do it, it is really easy. Practice makes you quicker! | |
| 16 | 9.87 seconds | Boris Konrad | There it is! Sub10! YES :) SpeedStacks Timer, lubed Clock, Stefans system (thanks!) | 20060305 |
| 17 | 10.31 seconds | Joseph Liao | Rubik's Clock is addicting! Thanks to Stefan's site, don't forget to visit mine ;) My site. | |
| 18 | 10.61 seconds | Dan Cohen | Very easy. | 20080304 |
| 19 | 10.64 seconds | Wim Lambrechts | close to sub-10 now | 20060622 |
| 20 | 10.81 seconds | Bob Burton | There is still room for improvement. Visit my site. | 20060602 |
| 21 | 10.98 seconds | Fumiki Koseki | next sub 10. | 20061217 |
| 22 | 11.23 seconds | Thomas Bischof | I know I've had at least one sub-10, but I of course forgot to record it. Had this puzzle for a few weeks now. | 20040814 |
| 23 | 11.67 seconds | Ben Picolo | That brings me to top 10, eh :) | 20051021 |
| 24 | 11.93 seconds | Lucas Garron | Got fast today. Completely non-lucky solve, just very smooth. | 20071112 |
| 25 | 11.99 seconds | Anssi Vanhala | n/a | 20060417 |
| 26 | 12 seconds | Jasmine Lee | I was really excited when this puzzle came out, but I quickly realised that in no way could it live up to The Cube. It's definitely much easier than it looks. Having said this, I couldn't do 12 secs now, I set this time ages ago when the puzzle first came out. Haven't touched a Clock in years. | |
| 27 | 12.22 seconds | Hadley Sheffield | Hope to have times like this at nationals! | 20080508 |
| 28 | 12.33 seconds | Pedro Campos | I had this bet with a friend; he told me I couldn't do it below 13s his rubik's clock. Did it :) I don't think I'll practice to get a faster solve (perhaps BF it some day), I also have a sub30 cube solve bet going on ;) | |
| 29 | 13.12 seconds | Thom Barlow | I'm aiming for sub-10 here. Doesn't look that far off, either. | 20050908 |
| 30 | 13.56 seconds | Tobias Daneels | Thanks to stijn for teaching me. | 20051201 |
| 31 | 13.73 seconds | Craig Bouchard | When I get into this mode, all my puzzles just start getting good times, and I break a lot of PBs. | 20051121 |
| 32 | 14.37 seconds | Thomas Le Roux | My first sub-15. | 20060927 |
| 33 | 14.63 seconds | Michael Gottlieb | Not lucky, but this is fast for me. | 20070205 |
| 34 | 14.80 seconds | Gilles van den Peereboom | n/a | 20050905 |
| 35 | 14.90 seconds | Charlie Cooper | i need a smooth turning clock! | 20071112 |
| 36 | 15.15 seconds | Joe Wallace | I'm pretty pleased with this. | 20060313 |
| 37 | 16.06 seconds | Tim Sun | Best non-lucky solve of my best average. | 20060526 |
| 38 | 16.08 seconds | Tristan Wright | Very satisfied with this time, hope to soon get under 15 seconds. | 20060512 |
| 39 | 16.59 seconds | Emanuele Scibilia | Not a good result, I know. But I have a lot to improve. I have to practice more. :P The Italian Rubik's cube group | 20071201 |
| 40 | 16.72 seconds | Jacco Krijnen | A little bit lucky. 2 clocks skipped. | 20080224 |
| 41 | 17.44 seconds | Kelley Reynolds | n/a | |
| 42 | 18.02 seconds | Ben Luo | Still getting used to Stefan Pochmann's method. | 20060418 |
| 43 | 19.97 seconds | Sean Connolly | A pretty good solve. By no means lucky, but I was able to set 3 clocks on the cross with my opening move. My clock turns nice & smoothly, and by the way, Dan Harris, YOU'RE NOT HAVING MY CLOCK! ;-) Oh maybe if you want to borrow it on DCD'05 but I must have it back!!! Who is 'Absolute' and who is 'Obsolete' anyway? Me, I'm just plain confused! ;-) | 20051013 |
| 44 | 20.00 seconds | Zebadiah W. Ziegenbein | I got this puzzle just this weekend in the mail, i bought it off ebay for 2.99 and it came with the box and instructions. And it was only a state away!! This was pretty good since i have only had it like 3 days. And when i opened it with in 5 minutes of opening it, it was sovled. Now i just have to do a lot of practice on looking ahead at the other clocks and having a faster mind for this puzzle. And it moves pretty good too. | 20060424 |
| 45 | 26.46 seconds | Ben Whitmore | My first sub 30 seconds | 20080808 |
| 46 | 27 seconds | Rune Zedeler | Cannot go any faster than this. :-( Still thinks it pretty fast, though. Far too easy for a Rubik's puzzle. | |
| 47 | 27.01 seconds | Dan Harris | I want Sean Connolly's Clock. Cubestation.co.uk. [Obsolete Team member with Stefan] | 20050718 |
| 48 | 30.54 seconds | Thomas Clement | Bleh, getting better. Not quickly though. | 20060525 |
| 49 | 31.65 seconds | Ouyang Yunqi | n/a | 20080531 |
| 50 | 32.32 seconds | Ton Dennenbroek | Just tried 5 times | |
| 51 | 35.57 seconds | Mikael Vanhala | n/a | 20060417 |
| 52 | 46.08 seconds | Josh Rotholz | Not bad for my 10th ever solve ) I love this puzzle. | 20080503 |
| 53 | 47 seconds | Jeroen Hörters | easy puzzle | 20071015 |
| 54 | 2 minutes 36.74 seconds | Patrick Jameson | i beat my record by like a minute. | 20070217 |
| 55 | 2 minutes 53 seconds | James Watt | Just got it in the Mail today awesome little puzzle. I will keep at it and get faster I hope. Jarhead Cubing | 20060316 |
| 56 | 4 minutes | Jason Grochmal | Best I can do with my technique. |